Numerous Supreme Court cases address the rights of people arrested and charged with crimes.
No, you cannot be arrested for being belligerent. If, during the course of being belligerent, though, you are resisting arrest, you could be arrested for resisting arrest.
The Miranda decision of the Supreme Court was concerned with police informed the accused of their rights when they are arrested. They are called Miranda Rights.
Need more info. What is meant by "de-arrested?" Why was the person "de-arrested?" Why would that person now be concerned about being arrested again?
There is no requirement to advise arrested persons of their rights. The trigger for advice or rights under Miranda V Arizona is 'custodial interrogation'. A person arrested but not questioned is usually not advised of rights, but a person who is being questioned and is not free to leave, whether or not they are arrested must be advised.
formal sanction
Yes, this is possible. It is called "guilt by association".
Habeas Corpus protects a person from being imprisoned indefinitely without a trial
Hell.
Being arrested for larceny free text means that one person committed a non-violent theft. Larceny is done one person to another person, but in that nonviolent way.
HaShem, The Creator is not a person and was never born.
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)