answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What was the name of the 1966 Supreme Court case which defended the rights of those being arrested?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What was the name of the 1966 supreme court case which defended the rights those being arrested?

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)


What supreme court case protects a person being arrested?

Numerous Supreme Court cases address the rights of people arrested and charged with crimes.


The MIranda decision of the supreme court concerned?

The Miranda decision of the Supreme Court was concerned with police informed the accused of their rights when they are arrested. They are called Miranda Rights.


What was the name of the 1966supreme court case which defended the rights of those being arrested?

Miranda vs Arizona


What was the name of the 1966 supreme court case which defended the right of those being arrested?

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)


How did the supreme court defend the application of the First Amendment to the states?

Gitlow v. New York


Why was the Miranda vs Arizona case brought to the supreme court?

Miranda stated he didn't know his rights that are given in the 14th amendment, so the Supreme Court found that the police need to inform a person of their rights when they are arrested. Hence, the Miranda decision.


What was the name of the 1966 supreme court case which defends the rights of those being arrested?

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)


What was the name of the 1966 Supreme Court case which defend the rights of those being arrested?

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)


Who is case was heard by the Supreme Court and defended by John Quincy Adams?

Denmark Vesey


What Supreme Court case stated that suspects need to be advised of their constitutional rights when they are arrested?

There is no requirement to advise arrested persons of their rights. The trigger for advice or rights under Miranda V Arizona is 'custodial interrogation'. A person arrested but not questioned is usually not advised of rights, but a person who is being questioned and is not free to leave, whether or not they are arrested must be advised.


Which court is responsible for enforcement of fundamental rights?

supreme court and high court