0
It was John Tetzel who first created the indulgences. It happened in 1517. Luther had gotten mad at him and this affected and changed the church a lot. yw ;]
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What church practices made martin Luther defy church authorities completely?
A:Martin Luther did not at first seek to defy the Church, but rather to reform it. The Church's intransigence on matters he considered important eventually resulted in his defiance of church authorities. The most important concerns were the practice of buying and selling bishoprics and the practice of selling indulgences, both of which are regarded as simony.
What was martin Luther's main theological premise?
He at first mainly attacked the selling of indulgences in the church and then later on added ideas of "salvation by faith alone" and how to live as our savior Christ did.
What practice related to indulgences at the start of the 1500s left the church vulnerable to scrutiny and critcism?
Pope Leo X, who was pope from 1513-1521 managed to spend the vast sum of money that his predecessor, Julius II had left in the treasury within the first two years of his papacy. Trying to recover, he tried to raise money in numerous ways, one of them was that he debased many spiritual practices into little more than financial transactions. Although indulgences could be gained for any of the three spiritual works: prayer, fasting, and almsgiving; during this period almsgiving was highlighted and the Papacy took a lot portion of all alms given to gain an indulgence. It was borderline but still "kosher", however, Martin Luther raised such a stink about it and falsely accused Fr. Johann Tetzel of "selling indulgences". All of which, we are only now discovering is a bunch of lies and falsehoods concocted by Martin Luther. Martin Luther pretty much broke Fr. Tetzel with a series of outright lies that were believed during his lifetime and have been repeated by protestant historians to this day. from the Catholic Encyclopedia: The theses dispute between Luther and Tetzel, is handled so circumstantially in the article MARTIN LUTHER that we need not repeat it here. The publication of Luther's "Sermon on Indulgences and Grace" was replied to by Tetzel's "Vorlegung", issued in April, 1518 (Lea, in "A History of Auricular Confession and Indulgences", III, 395, erroneously makes it Vorlesung), in which the scholastically-trained theologican, though not profound, scents nevertheless with keen penetration, not a mere academic tournament, but a far-reaching and momentous battle of principles, involving the very fundamentals of the Christian religion and the authority of the Church. He lays bare with extraordinary precision the unfortunate consequences that would arise. At the close of his "Vorlegung", Tetzel announces that he would presently publish "a few other principles and positions". These are the second series of theses, fifty in number, with Tetzel as author, and published in May, 1518. In these, indulgences are but lightly touched upon, the burden of the argumentation being shifted to the authority of the Church. Tetzel as yet was only a bachelor of theology. In the course of 1518 he was promoted to the doctorate, whether by the master-general or the University of Frankfort is not known. Luther's agitation having frustrated further efforts to popularize the granted indulgence of eight years, Tetzel, deserted by the public, broken in spirit, wrecked in health, retired to his monastery at Leipzig in 1518. Here in the middle of January, 1519, he had to face the bitter reproaches and unjust incriminations of Carl von Meltitz. It was at this time that Luther magnanimously penned a letter in which he tries to console him by declaring "that the agitation was not that of his [Tetzel's] creation, but that the child had an entirely different father". Tetzel died soon after, received an honourable burial, and was interred before the high altar of the Dominican church at Leipzig. History presents few characters that have suffered more senseless misrepresentation, even bald caricature, than Tetzel. "Even while he lived stories which contained an element of legend gathered around his name, until at last, in the minds of the uncritical Protestant historians, he became the typical indulgence-monger, upon whom any well-worn anecdote might be fathered" (Beard, "Martin Luther", London, 1889, 210). For a critical scholarly study which shows him in a proper perspective, he had to wait the researches of our own time, mainly at the hands of Dr. Nicholas Paulus, who is closely followed in this article. In the first place, his teaching regarding the indulgences for the living was correct. The charge that the forgiveness of sins was sold for money regardless of contrition or that absolution for sins to be committed in the future could be purchased is baseless. An indulgence, he writes, can be applied only "to the pains of sin which are confessed and for which there is contrition". "No one", he furthermore adds, "secures an indulgence unless he have true contrition". The confessional letters (confessionalia) could of course be obtained for a mere pecuniary consideration without demanding contrition. But such document did not secure an indulgence. It was simply a permit to select a proper confessor, who only after a contrite confession would absolve from sin and reserved cases, and who possessed at the same time facilities to impart the plenary indulgence (Paulus, "Johann Tetzel", 103).
Who was responsible for the indulgence selling campaign which led to Martin Luther's break with the Catholic Church?
.Catholic AnswerYour question is making several incorrect assumptions. First of all, there was no "indulgence selling campaign." Second of all, indulgences could never be "sold" as such, they used to be granted for any of the works of mercy, especially for the three primary works of penace: Prayer, fasting, and almsgiving. Thus, up until the time of Martin Luther, it was perfectly respectable to earn an indulgence that was attached to a work of almsgiving. In this particular case, the almsgiving was a donation to the Church for the rebuilding of St. Peter's Basilica. Due to all the misinformation put out at the time, it is no longer possible. But even back then, the almsgiving was only part of the "work" necessary to earn an indulgence. As with today's indulgences (yes, they are still very much a part of the Church's teaching) a person must be in a state of grace, he must have been to confession within a week of the act being performed, and he should have made a good Communion, and said prayers for the Holy Father on the day that the work is performed. This is right out of the current Enchiridion of Indulgences Norms and Grants. Finally, even then, indulgences was NOT what led Martin Luther to flee the Catholic Church, his morals were, or shall we say, lack thereof. The man's name that you are looking for is Fr. Johann Tetzel, you may read more about him and this little problem with M. Luther at the link below. Further research, even from 100 years ago when the Catholic Encyclopedia was printed, has proved that the vast amount of libel about Fr. Tetzel is just that, unproven gossip mongering. All of the baseless charges leveled by protestant "theologians" and "historians" over the years has been pure fantasy, or research based on pure fantasy.
What country did Martin Luther first made his protests against the Roman Catholic Church?
The Reformation began in Germany on Oct. 31, 1517, when Martin Luther, an Augustinian university professor at Wittenberg, posted 95 theses inviting debate over the legitimacy of the sale of indulgences.
What church practices made martin Luther defy church authorities completely?
A:Martin Luther did not at first seek to defy the Church, but rather to reform it. The Church's intransigence on matters he considered important eventually resulted in his defiance of church authorities. The most important concerns were the practice of buying and selling bishoprics and the practice of selling indulgences, both of which are regarded as simony.
What was martin Luther's main theological premise?
He at first mainly attacked the selling of indulgences in the church and then later on added ideas of "salvation by faith alone" and how to live as our savior Christ did.
What practice related to indulgences at the start of the 1500s left the church vulnerable to scrutiny and critcism?
Pope Leo X, who was pope from 1513-1521 managed to spend the vast sum of money that his predecessor, Julius II had left in the treasury within the first two years of his papacy. Trying to recover, he tried to raise money in numerous ways, one of them was that he debased many spiritual practices into little more than financial transactions. Although indulgences could be gained for any of the three spiritual works: prayer, fasting, and almsgiving; during this period almsgiving was highlighted and the Papacy took a lot portion of all alms given to gain an indulgence. It was borderline but still "kosher", however, Martin Luther raised such a stink about it and falsely accused Fr. Johann Tetzel of "selling indulgences". All of which, we are only now discovering is a bunch of lies and falsehoods concocted by Martin Luther. Martin Luther pretty much broke Fr. Tetzel with a series of outright lies that were believed during his lifetime and have been repeated by protestant historians to this day. from the Catholic Encyclopedia: The theses dispute between Luther and Tetzel, is handled so circumstantially in the article MARTIN LUTHER that we need not repeat it here. The publication of Luther's "Sermon on Indulgences and Grace" was replied to by Tetzel's "Vorlegung", issued in April, 1518 (Lea, in "A History of Auricular Confession and Indulgences", III, 395, erroneously makes it Vorlesung), in which the scholastically-trained theologican, though not profound, scents nevertheless with keen penetration, not a mere academic tournament, but a far-reaching and momentous battle of principles, involving the very fundamentals of the Christian religion and the authority of the Church. He lays bare with extraordinary precision the unfortunate consequences that would arise. At the close of his "Vorlegung", Tetzel announces that he would presently publish "a few other principles and positions". These are the second series of theses, fifty in number, with Tetzel as author, and published in May, 1518. In these, indulgences are but lightly touched upon, the burden of the argumentation being shifted to the authority of the Church. Tetzel as yet was only a bachelor of theology. In the course of 1518 he was promoted to the doctorate, whether by the master-general or the University of Frankfort is not known. Luther's agitation having frustrated further efforts to popularize the granted indulgence of eight years, Tetzel, deserted by the public, broken in spirit, wrecked in health, retired to his monastery at Leipzig in 1518. Here in the middle of January, 1519, he had to face the bitter reproaches and unjust incriminations of Carl von Meltitz. It was at this time that Luther magnanimously penned a letter in which he tries to console him by declaring "that the agitation was not that of his [Tetzel's] creation, but that the child had an entirely different father". Tetzel died soon after, received an honourable burial, and was interred before the high altar of the Dominican church at Leipzig. History presents few characters that have suffered more senseless misrepresentation, even bald caricature, than Tetzel. "Even while he lived stories which contained an element of legend gathered around his name, until at last, in the minds of the uncritical Protestant historians, he became the typical indulgence-monger, upon whom any well-worn anecdote might be fathered" (Beard, "Martin Luther", London, 1889, 210). For a critical scholarly study which shows him in a proper perspective, he had to wait the researches of our own time, mainly at the hands of Dr. Nicholas Paulus, who is closely followed in this article. In the first place, his teaching regarding the indulgences for the living was correct. The charge that the forgiveness of sins was sold for money regardless of contrition or that absolution for sins to be committed in the future could be purchased is baseless. An indulgence, he writes, can be applied only "to the pains of sin which are confessed and for which there is contrition". "No one", he furthermore adds, "secures an indulgence unless he have true contrition". The confessional letters (confessionalia) could of course be obtained for a mere pecuniary consideration without demanding contrition. But such document did not secure an indulgence. It was simply a permit to select a proper confessor, who only after a contrite confession would absolve from sin and reserved cases, and who possessed at the same time facilities to impart the plenary indulgence (Paulus, "Johann Tetzel", 103).
Who was responsible for the indulgence selling campaign which led to Martin Luther's break with the Catholic Church?
.Catholic AnswerYour question is making several incorrect assumptions. First of all, there was no "indulgence selling campaign." Second of all, indulgences could never be "sold" as such, they used to be granted for any of the works of mercy, especially for the three primary works of penace: Prayer, fasting, and almsgiving. Thus, up until the time of Martin Luther, it was perfectly respectable to earn an indulgence that was attached to a work of almsgiving. In this particular case, the almsgiving was a donation to the Church for the rebuilding of St. Peter's Basilica. Due to all the misinformation put out at the time, it is no longer possible. But even back then, the almsgiving was only part of the "work" necessary to earn an indulgence. As with today's indulgences (yes, they are still very much a part of the Church's teaching) a person must be in a state of grace, he must have been to confession within a week of the act being performed, and he should have made a good Communion, and said prayers for the Holy Father on the day that the work is performed. This is right out of the current Enchiridion of Indulgences Norms and Grants. Finally, even then, indulgences was NOT what led Martin Luther to flee the Catholic Church, his morals were, or shall we say, lack thereof. The man's name that you are looking for is Fr. Johann Tetzel, you may read more about him and this little problem with M. Luther at the link below. Further research, even from 100 years ago when the Catholic Encyclopedia was printed, has proved that the vast amount of libel about Fr. Tetzel is just that, unproven gossip mongering. All of the baseless charges leveled by protestant "theologians" and "historians" over the years has been pure fantasy, or research based on pure fantasy.
What is the link between the pope Henry VIII Martin Luther and coins?
if you are trying to answer this for a history question or something like that this is the best answer you will get well first of all there was a script that anne bolyen gave king henry from the indulgences of the church but the thing was that martin luther was the person who wrote out the list of indulgences and so they were connected or they were the link to eachother
What country did Martin Luther first made his protests against the Roman Catholic Church?
The Reformation began in Germany on Oct. 31, 1517, when Martin Luther, an Augustinian university professor at Wittenberg, posted 95 theses inviting debate over the legitimacy of the sale of indulgences.
Who was the first protestant who broke away from a Catholic Church?
Martin Luther
Who was the first protestants leader to change the catholic church?
Martin Luther. By nailing the ninet-five theses to the churchdoor (which was commonly used as a bulletin board for important papers). He declared that he was prepared to challenge the Roman Catholic church concerning indulgences.
Who was the first Protestant leader to change the Catholic Church?
Martin Luther. By nailing the ninet-five theses to the churchdoor (which was commonly used as a bulletin board for important papers). He declared that he was prepared to challenge the Roman Catholic church concerning indulgences.
Who was pope at the time of the reformation?
Pope Julius II (1503-13), the 'Warrior Pope', was in power when Martin Luther became a Doctor of Theology in 1512. Pope Julius II firmly and diplomatically reasserted temporal strength in the papacy, and it was the selling of indulgences for his ambitious building projects that first irked Luther. But there were several Popes spanning Luther's life (1483-1546) and Reformation activities. Luther gained Reformation prominence in 1517 with his 95 Theses, and it was Leo X (1513-21), a Medici, who excommunicated Luther in 1521. But Leo X also died that year, and his cousin, Pope Clement VII (1523-34), joined with Emperor Charles V as Luther's adversary for the next decade. Pope Paul III's (1534-49) Counter-Reformation in the Council of Trent (1545) perhaps stands in greatest contrast to Luther and the Protestant Reformation, as Luther's health failed in the final 15 years of his life.
What church practices did Martin Luther become outraged by?
Attached below is a English copy of Martin Luther's 95 Theses which contain the Church practices that he was questioning, I think "outraged" might be a bit over the top. Most the practices he was questioning were connected with indulgences, pardons, and confession, however, a quick look through his 95 Theses even by a first year seminarian would quickly reveal that Martin Luther really didn't know what he was talking about, many of the things that he asked for were already Church teaching. I believe that the practice that Martin Luther was most upset about was the fact that the Church asked him to lead a moral life as Luther spent the rest of his life trying to justify why he didn't have to repent and reform his life.
Who criticized the Catholic Church and launched the Protestant Reformation?
AnswerMartin Luther was a priest and professor of theology when he criticised the sale of indulgences, seeking at first only to reform the practice and to improve the governance of the Roman Catholic Church. His consequent excommunication led to the Protestant Reformation.
