Yes. It means "say for the third time."
No, "repeat again" is redundant. It is better to use either "repeat" or "say it again" to convey the same message.
While "repeat again" is commonly used in everyday language, it is considered redundant because "repeat" already implies doing something again. It is better to simply say "repeat" or "do it again" for clarity and to avoid redundancy.
The phrase "You are not knowing" is not grammatically correct. Instead, you can use "You do not know" or "You are not aware."
'Rhoda's crazy' is grammatically correct.
Yes, "He sailed his boat on the river" is grammatically correct.
The phrase "Is you don't miss me do you" is not grammatically correct. It should be rephrased to something like "Don't you miss me?" to be correct.
While "repeat again" is commonly used in everyday language, it is considered redundant because "repeat" already implies doing something again. It is better to simply say "repeat" or "do it again" for clarity and to avoid redundancy.
Unless you are referring to it for the THIRD time, use "repeat." Iterate already means "repeat" and so re-iterate means repeat again.
That is the correct spelling of the verb "repeat" (to do or say again).
I felt moved once again
The correct spelling is "repeat." (to do again)
"Not like that" can be grammatically correct, depending on the context.
Yes! That is grammatically correct!
Yes, 'for free', is grammatically correct.
The phrase "You are not knowing" is not grammatically correct. Instead, you can use "You do not know" or "You are not aware."
Yes, Almighty God is grammatically correct.
"That was wrong" is a grammatically correct sentence.
Yes, it is grammatically correct.