MHz (Megahertz) is used to measure several different things, so it depends on the context.
NO, a HDMI cable is just a HDMI cable. The 240 stuff is just hype.
pass 240 volts through it
Personaly, i have to R/C cars that are 27 MHZ and 49 MHZ and my 49 MHZ goes faster than the 27 MHZ. but the 27 MHZ has much more control than the 49 MHZ.
If talking about processors then, no.
1.10 MHz is tremendously slower than 750 MHz. If you meant 1.10 GHz vs. 750 MHz, then yes, 1.10 GHz is faster than 750 MHz.
No. It is 100 MHz slower.
speed ofcource.. 800 mhz PC will be slower than 1099 mhz PC because of slow data rate..
1795 mhz = 1.795 ghz there pretty close, but no.
No, the Geforce GTX 480 should beat the GTX 295 statistically speaking (although they are close in performance): Geforce GTX 295: -Core Clock: 576 MHz -Shader Clock: 1242 MHz -Memory Clock: 1000 MHz -Processing Cores: 480 Geforce GTX 480: -Core Clock: 700 MHz -Shader Clock: 1401 MHz -Memory Clock: 1848 MHz -Processing Cores: 480
"Classic" Pentiums were available with clock speeds of 60, 66, 75, 90, 100, 120, 133, 150, 166, and 200 Mhz. Pentiums with MMX extensions were available in 120, 133, 150, 166, 200, 233, 266, and 300 MHz.
It's in relation to speed. 533 is slower than 800.
"Classic" Pentiums were available with clock speeds of 60, 66, 75, 90, 100, 120, 133, 150, 166, and 200 Mhz. Pentiums with MMX extensions were available in 120, 133, 150, 166, 200, 233, 266, and 300 MHz.