NO, a HDMI cable is just a HDMI cable. The 240 stuff is just hype.
20.96
6 MHz
MHz (Megahertz) is used to measure several different things, so it depends on the context.In radio transmission, neither frequency is used by most consumers (120 Mhz is in the air traffic band, 240 MHz is used by military aircraft). Since both are used for voice transfer (as opposed to data), neither one is "better" for that purpose.In microprocessors, MHz refers to the number of cycles a processor completes each second. If all other things about the two processors are equal, the 240 MHz one will be faster. This number cannot be used to compare two dissimilar processors, however, such as an Intel Pentium and a Motorola 68060.
pass 240 volts through it
Cat 5 is a type or standard of ethernet cable (350 Mhz) and is not as good as the Cat 6 (500+Mhz) which will work wherever you were going to use the Cat 5 ethernet cable and not require replacement as cable/DSL broadband internet speeds increase
1
Cat 5
200ns
I know there's a 550 mhz and plenum cable for the Cat6 cables
Cat 5 is a type or standard of ethernet cable (350 Mhz) and is not as good as the Cat 6 (500+Mhz) which will work wherever you were going to use the Cat 5 ethernet cable and not require replacement as cable/DSL broadband internet speeds increase
There is no such processor as an Athlon x2 480. If you mean an Athlon 4800, and an Athlon II 240... The 4800 is a dual core, 1 MB L2 cache processor operating a 2.4 GHz, and has a 2000 MHz FSB The II 240 has 2 MB of L2 cache, operates at 2.8 GHz, has a 4000 MHz FSB, and utilizes a newer design. It is more efficient, runs cooler, support virtualization, and has updated instruction sets. The II 240 is significantly more powerful.
.66 as stated but I calculate a different value when applied to radio frequency at 50 mhz.