By alternate energy I assume you mean wind, solar, wave, tide, and possibly biomass. Wind and solar are useful and free once the equipment is built, the trouble is they are not reliable 24 hour sources, as nuclear is. Wave and tide are hardly established, but again would be subject to weather and tidal conditions which vary. Biomass is again useful and renewable so long as crops are grown at the same rate they are consumed, but I don't think it can provide more than a fairly modest amount of power. So I don't think there is a valid comparison. It would be more realistic to compare nuclear with coal and natural gas, to weigh up the merits of each.
Solar energy is generally considered a better source than nuclear energy due to its lower environmental impact, reliance on renewable resources, and greater accessibility to individuals and communities. Solar energy also has lower operating costs and does not pose the same risk of catastrophic accidents as nuclear power plants.
Cheaper, More energy than fossil fuel, Better for the air
yes i believe that nuclear energy is cheaper than others
Re-newable
is economic imbalance is better than nuclear imbalance
Because you can use it and it makes less energy for people and its better than the other plants in the world also it makes a better place ;)
nuclear is a type of electricity
From the nuclear forces. An U-235 atom has a higher energy level than its daughter products; this is used in nuclear fission.
yes
Energy from nuclear fusion is around 400 times more than that of nuclear fission for same mass.
Nuclear energy is a clean energy and doesn't pollute the atmosphere
Because wind energy is reusable and never runs out and does not harm the planet.