Most probably potassium acetate is meant, which is soluble like (almost) all potassium salts.
This compound is not possible.
no
yes
No
KCH3CO2=potasium acetate.
Acetate ion is CH3C00-, C2H3O2-. It is the conjugate base of acetic acid, CH3COOH
Cu2(C2H3O2)4 + 2Na2S --> 2CuS + 4Na(C2H3O2) 170 mL Cu2(C2H3O2)4 X 1 L/ 1OOO mL X .3 M/ 1 Mol X 2 Mol CuS/ 1 Mol Cu2(C2H3O2)4 X 159.157 g/ 1 Mol CuS = 16.2 g
soluble
soluble ink is ink that is soluble
is Al(C2H3O2)3 ionic or covalent
Pb+2 C2H3O2-1
Cr+3 C2H3O2-1 <----- these are the ions and their charges Cr+3 C2H3O2-1 C2H3O2-1 C2H3O2-1 <---- the charges have to add up to zero, so three -1 acetate ions cancel out one +3 chromium ion Cr(C2H3O2)3 <----- simplify
KCH3CO2=potasium acetate.
Na2CO3+2H(C2H3O2) >2Na(C2H3O2) + CO2+H20
Li is the atomic symbol on the periodic table for Lithium, and C2H3O2 is the configuration for acetate. Together, this reads "Lithium acetate"
C2H3O2 is part of the ethanoic (acetic) acid formula (C2H4O2), minus one hydrogen atom (proton). So you often see C2H3O2 expressed as part of acetate formulae such as in Lead acetate Pb(C2H3O2)2.
Ag++ C2H3O2 -
Ba+2 C2H3O2-1
The formula for iron(II) acetate is to my knowledge Fe(C2H3O2)2. And iron(III) acetate is to my knowledge Fe(C2H3O2)3.
Ca+2 C2H3O2-1 <---- these are the ions and their charges Ca+2 C2H3O2-1 C2H3O2-1 <----- the charges have to add up to zero, so two -1 acetate ions cancel out one +2 calcium ion Ca(C2H3O2)2 <----- simplify
C2H3O2- is the acetate ion.