Evolution is something that nobody seriously doubts, the evidence is all around. But you have in mind the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection: a scientific theory originated by Darwin after his voyage in the Research ship Beagle. Some religious sects take exception to the element of this theory that ascribes completely new species to the mechanisms that Darwin describes, wishing to reserve the creation of species to God's work alone. Darwin's theory features: natural variation by sexual reproduction, with mutations. The elimination of most dfferent forms because they are not well-adapted to the conditions. The survival of a FEW different forms because they suit the conditions better (or the conditions have changed enough to make them more successful at present) If different forms survive and multiply, then over millions of generations, the forms of survivors can be dramatically different. It is difficult to observe the effects of millions of generations, except in creatures with very, very short lifespans - but there are many of those too: bacteria, flies and insicts for example. Even so, Darwin's theory is taught in every state of the US and every developed country because it is successful in predicting and explaining observed data: this is the test of all scientific theories. /Brian W
Mitt Romney believes that God created the universe, and evolution is the mechanism He used to create humans. Romney believes that science classes should have evolution taught, not creationism or intelligent design. He states that they are perfectly fine in a philosophy, religion, or history classroom. This is his view from 2008. It seems that he has been relatively quiet on this issue since he started running for the Republican nomination.
No theory contradicts evolution. Evolution is the basepoint of all Biology.
Because adaptations are an observed effect of evolution. They could not happen if evolution did not occur.
You can find an overview of stelar evolution in the Wikipedia article entitled "Stellar evolution".
Actually, biological evolution was never proven, though still taught in schools as a fact. Thousands, if not millions of different chemicals had to have been there all at the same exact time, with the perfect timing and arrangement for even a single-cell organism to be created. The probability of all of those factors to be perfectly arranged and mixed together is 101,000,000,000 or 10 to the power of 1 billion. 102 is only a 1% chance anyway, so 101,000,000,000 is literally next to impossible.
Evolution should be taught in schools because it is a well-established scientific theory supported by a vast amount of evidence. Understanding evolution is essential for students to grasp the principles of biology and to critically evaluate scientific knowledge. Teaching evolution does not imply denying or negating any individual's beliefs or religious views.
Charles DArwin
Evolution is a widely accepted scientific theory supported by extensive evidence, and should be taught in science classes. Creationism, however, is based on religious beliefs and is not supported by scientific evidence, so it is not appropriate to be taught in a science classroom. It may be more suitable for discussion in courses on religion or philosophy.
evolution
Rick Santorum does not believe evolution is a proven fact, and that it should not be taught as such in public schools. In addition, he believes other theories of how the universe came into existence should be taught alongside evolution. He proposed language to the No Child Left Behind Act to that effect.
The court case which ruled that evolution could be taught in schools was that of Edwards v. Aguillard.
All rational people. It is not a matter of belief, though, as what manifests itself in the real world, and evolution does that, is not subject to " beliefs " and is true whether you believe it or not. Evolution, the change in allele frequency over time in a population of organisms, is a fact. The theory of evolution by natural selection explains much of this fact. Evolution and the theory of evolution by natural selection is the foundation of biology and it makes little sense not to teach it. The courts have spoken, both at the local and Federal level, so evolution is taught in schools. How rigorously it is taught varies by region. Regardless, science does not adhere to argumentum ad populum.
he openly taught about evolution and broke the law
Most certainly not side-by-side. That would imply that they are equivalent notions. Evolution, however, is a scientific theory, and creationism is religious myth. Evolution belongs in biology classes, creationism in something like comparative religion courses.
Teachers? I'm not sure I understand your question.
Do you mean legal to be taught in schools? Evolution has been the accepted theory as to the origin of 'complex' life for around 150 years. I'm not sure when it became legal to be taught in schools. Probably around the same time the scientific community accepted it.
Many biology teachers have taught about this, but Charles Darwin was the man credited for first discovering the mechanism and writing about it.