curse everyone who just says yes or no, history is a matter of opinion not fact. in my opinion he was a good king but if an other person was to come they would say otherwise.
he was a good king because he was stradegic and knew tons of ways to rule England better, however had bad advisors.
he was a bad king because he also made silly choices for examples, store horses in a church to embarass the priest and to win a siege.
after king john died it was said that two monks (not the shaolins by the way) argued over if he was a good or a bad king and in the end ripped the book in half to show that god should say what would happen to him.
king john did lots of nice things. he also signed the magna carta
Henry VII wasn't a good defender, and he wasn't a very nice person either. Henry VIII was a good King, and looked after England well, but was a womanizer and wasn't very nice to his wives.
Yes he was a very nice king
who is king john
yes
king arthur was nice and overprotective
my friend it is king henry because king john is a good king in them days
King Authur was a good King who turn out to fight in a war.
John became King in 1199 after his brother, King Richard I, died.
Was king John clever
HA! they where not nice to the king..well it depends what king your are talking about.
John Michael King's birth name is John Michael King.