No, they are not the same. See the article on "Nebuchadrezzar I" from Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nebuchadrezzar_I)
Nebuchadrezzar I, also known as Nebuchadnezzar I,... was the king of the Babylonian Empire from about 1125 B.C.E. to 1103 B.C.E. He is considered to be the greatest king of the Dynasty of Pashe ... He is not to be confused with the more well-known Nebuchadnezzar II of biblical fame . Nebuchadnezzar II was also known as "Nebuchadnezzar the Great" and lived c 630-562 BC.
There was no King of England in 1620 but there was a King of Great Britain. Namely James VI and I (same person).
No Martin Luther King junior is NOT the same person as Nelson Mandela. They are to completely different people. Have you heard of Martin Luther King's beginning of his speech? Martin Luther King- "Five score years ago..." Nelson Mandela- "Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate."
Moses and king tut weren't living at the same time period. The only thing that is in common in the time period they lived in is that they both live before Jesus was born
A viceroy is a smaller version of a king, a viceroy is a person with the same amount of power as a king and is responsible for a certain amount of land.
no Hatshepsut was the first female ruler of egypt, cleopatra was an egyptian queen who married a greek king.
It is the same person.
Yes, Laurence Daren King and Daren King are likely the same person. It is possible that "Laurence" is their full name while "Daren" is a shortened or preferred version of their name.
No
no
They were both leaders of Babylon at one point.
Nebuchadnezzar the Chaldean destroyed the first Temple of the Jews in 586 BC. (King Solomon built it in circa 950 BC). Some Jews returned to Canaan-Israel about 100 years after its destruction (circa 480 BC) and built a second temple which the Romans destroyed in 70 AD on the same day of the year as Nebuchadnezzar destroyed the first temple.Nebuchadnezzar is alternatively named Nebuchadrezzar in the Bible. The difference in the two names is the 'chadn' in the first and 'chadr' in the second. Actually, when one looks closely at the various entries for this king in the Hebrew text of the Jewish Biblical account, one finds several different spellings mainly regarding vowels. But the English translators generally ignore these slight differences. The two main differences, which English translators did transliterate for modern readers, actually enable us to learn something even more important about this king.In Hebrew and Phoenician the letters 'r' and 'd', in their respective alphabets, are quite similar. It seems the scribes occasionally confused these letters. That would be especially likely when Jewish scribes looking at a text in Phoenician where "Nebuchardezzar" was written correctly then accidentally recopied it in Hebrew as "Nebuchadrezzar". Thus Nebuchardezzar is actually the correct rendering. But who is Nebuchardezzar? Nebo or Nebu means the planet Mercury (Hermes in Greek). Zzar or Tzar (Tsar) means "king". That leaves us with Nebo's King of the Chards. The Chards are the Kurds. Thus we could say "Nebuchadnezzar King of the ancient Kurds" destroyed Solomon's Temple. That also means today's Kurds are the descendants of the ancient Chaldeans (or the Kasdim in the Hebrew texts). That's because the Bible records Nebuchadnezzar-Nebuchadrezzar as "King of Chaldean Babylon". Modern Israelis and Jews do not blame the Kurds for destroying their temple. They acknowledged then and today that God allowed the Kurds (Chaldeans) to do this because of the idolatory of the ancient Jews at the time. This is all recorded in the Bible and subsequent Jewish generations of scribes have faithfully preserved this history for us including Nebuchadnezzar's conversion to belief in the God of Israel. That is one reason why the Jewish Bible is so reliable. We can trust the Jewish record, minor errors apart. Even then, the minor errors sometimes explain other problems. So we can win both ways in a sense.
I don't know who "King Samson" is. There's no such person in the Bible. The Biblical Samson was a Judge, not a King; the first King was Saul, a century or so later.Do you perhaps mean King Solomon? If so, very different person.[Edit: There's apparently a rapper or something named "King Solomon". If that's what you mean, obviously not the same person.]
There was no King of England in 1620 but there was a King of Great Britain. Namely James VI and I (same person).
Judah submitted to Babylonia in 605 BCE, after a period of Egyptian control, but rebelled in 600 BCE, in anticipation of Egyptian assistance. Babylon retook Jerusalem in 597. At this stage, Nebuchadnezzar's interest in Judah was its strategic position between Babylon and Egypt. There was an insurrection under Zedekiah in 588 BCE. Nebuchadnezzar could scarcely accept a rebellion that would foreshadow the breakup of his empire, and began a two-year siege of Jerusalem, which he destroyed in 586 BCE and then exiled much of the remnant population of Jerusalem.
King Louis IX of France is the same person as Saint Louis.
The King of England and the King of Scotland were the same person. And they still are.
No Martin Luther King junior is NOT the same person as Nelson Mandela. They are to completely different people. Have you heard of Martin Luther King's beginning of his speech? Martin Luther King- "Five score years ago..." Nelson Mandela- "Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate."