yes he was a good leader and he never ruled the land or the people he was never a ruler.
Louis Riel is considered by many to have been a good leader because he stood firmly for what he believed in, but was also willing to compromise. Riel founded the province of Manitoba, and was a strong advocate for the Metis people, an aboriginal group in Canada.
He were good leader Because good student at the college DE Montreal and received a broad education in languages including English and the sciences.
it depends on your perspective. if you're on the English side, then Louis riel was a pest. if you're on the french side, then Louis riel was a great hero who defended their rights.
he fought for the freedom of the Metis. ---------------------- Riel did little to nothing good for Canada. He exposed the myth that the North and West lands Canada bought and colonised were empty of people. He also showed that Canada was just as capable of the violence of the British Empire when they sent troops into what is today Western Canada and used force and massive immigration to advance their colonisation cause.
yes
Not good. Louis Riel disproves many Canadian myths, including that nice peaceful myth. Canada took land by force, killed those who stood in it's way and then vilified the dead while writing a glorious history to teach all Canadians. Which would be all so much easier if Riel and those like him would just go away.
Sakagawea
you don't, he is a very good political leader
-He is the Father of Manitoba -He fought for what he believed in -He helped many Metis -He tried to help others but his help was not wanted
It is important for parties to choose a good leader as a candidate because they want their candidate to win. A good leader will have a better chance of beating the other candidate.
The best brief description of Louis Riel is "clever but unbalanced." Riel's sanity during the so-called Red River Rebellion (the formation of the provisional government in 1868-70) is questionable. His legal analysis of the situation which led to the formation of the provisional government, however, was quite sound. There is little doubt among historians concerning the period during which he led the North West Rebellion of 1885. Riel was then clearly not sane.