yes Nero is a very bad person
he killed christians by:
"And in their deaths they were made the subjects of sport; for they were wrapped in the hides of wild beasts and torn to pieces by dogs, or nailed to crosses, or set on fire, and when day declined, were burned to serve for nocturnal lights."
He killed his mother, wife, and half brother.
A bad person who killed his mother and brother-Or at least that is the popular picture of Nero. If you look closely at Nero's reign, you will see that he was a cultured, artistic individual, who was the only ancient Roman emperor interested in technology. He was an extremist in his generosity and that's what got him into so much financial trouble. True, he killed his mother and brother, but there were reasons. He was well liked by the population at home and respected by foreign leaders, in particular Parthia, Rome's traditional enemy.
nero was a bad man. he killed his own mother and was said to have burned down everything so he could build his mansion.
IN a book titled IMPACT, it states that Agustus was a good emperor while Caligula and Nero were bad emperors and weak.
The emperors Nero and Caligula were both known for their extravagance. Caligula is said to have been mad and is noted for his wild parties and his abuse of authority. Nero, in addition to being a big spender, is remembered for killing his mother and his prosecution of the Christians.
Type your answer here... bad
Nero and Vespasian
Nero could not have said something bad to Augustus. Augustus died in 14 AD.Nerowas born in 37 AD.
he was good and bad
NO he was a bad guy he is the badest of all
That's a hard question to answer. The aristocrats hated him, and most of our history about him comes from aristocratic sources. He did many negative and bad things, but he had reasons for most of them. Because he acted extremely in certain circumstances, he is labeled as a bad emperor. However there was another side to Nero; he was inventive and generous, he was a builder and innovator. While he outraged the aristocrats, the common people loved him. For five years after his death, the common people piled his grave with flowers. Twenty years after his death an impostor in Parthia claimed to be Nero and raised an army on Nero's popularity. It stands to reason that a person who still had prestige twenty years after his death could not have been all bad.
He killed his mother, wife, and half brother.
A bad person who killed his mother and brother-Or at least that is the popular picture of Nero. If you look closely at Nero's reign, you will see that he was a cultured, artistic individual, who was the only ancient Roman emperor interested in technology. He was an extremist in his generosity and that's what got him into so much financial trouble. True, he killed his mother and brother, but there were reasons. He was well liked by the population at home and respected by foreign leaders, in particular Parthia, Rome's traditional enemy.
nero was a bad man. he killed his own mother and was said to have burned down everything so he could build his mansion.
IN a book titled IMPACT, it states that Agustus was a good emperor while Caligula and Nero were bad emperors and weak.
No, Nero was considered a bad emperor as his memory was damned by the senate. However the ancient Roman senate could be said to be a bit biased as far as Nero was concerned as the senatorial class suffered massive losses in both financial and property areas due to Nero.No, Nero was considered a bad emperor as his memory was damned by the senate. However the ancient Roman senate could be said to be a bit biased as far as Nero was concerned as the senatorial class suffered massive losses in both financial and property areas due to Nero.No, Nero was considered a bad emperor as his memory was damned by the senate. However the ancient Roman senate could be said to be a bit biased as far as Nero was concerned as the senatorial class suffered massive losses in both financial and property areas due to Nero.No, Nero was considered a bad emperor as his memory was damned by the senate. However the ancient Roman senate could be said to be a bit biased as far as Nero was concerned as the senatorial class suffered massive losses in both financial and property areas due to Nero.No, Nero was considered a bad emperor as his memory was damned by the senate. However the ancient Roman senate could be said to be a bit biased as far as Nero was concerned as the senatorial class suffered massive losses in both financial and property areas due to Nero.No, Nero was considered a bad emperor as his memory was damned by the senate. However the ancient Roman senate could be said to be a bit biased as far as Nero was concerned as the senatorial class suffered massive losses in both financial and property areas due to Nero.No, Nero was considered a bad emperor as his memory was damned by the senate. However the ancient Roman senate could be said to be a bit biased as far as Nero was concerned as the senatorial class suffered massive losses in both financial and property areas due to Nero.No, Nero was considered a bad emperor as his memory was damned by the senate. However the ancient Roman senate could be said to be a bit biased as far as Nero was concerned as the senatorial class suffered massive losses in both financial and property areas due to Nero.No, Nero was considered a bad emperor as his memory was damned by the senate. However the ancient Roman senate could be said to be a bit biased as far as Nero was concerned as the senatorial class suffered massive losses in both financial and property areas due to Nero.
Franco Nero is a veteran Italian actor who once starred as Sir Lancelot in the film, Camelot. In Italian language, Franco means the free one and Nero means a black person.