The US has signed the Convention.
The Article 2 of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.
David L. Nersessian has written: 'Genocide and political groups' -- subject(s): Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Genocide
Sentinel Project for Genocide Prevention was created in 2008-08.
Linda C. Krajcovic has written: 'Application of a discursive model of democracy to assess the legitimacy of the exclusion of political groups from the Genocide Convention's definition of genocide' -- subject(s): Convention on the Prevention and Treatment of Genocide, Dissertations, Pressure groups, University of Toronto, University of Toronto. Faculty of Law
The genocide convention
Yes. Failed attempts at genocide are still criminal acts.
This is termed as "Genocide" by international standards; the Convention on the prevention of Genocide, and in the United States is either a violation of Civil Rights: a crime under 18 USC 241 & 242 as well as a civil infraction under 42 USC 1983 - or if it happens to more than one person (a group) it is an act of Genocide under 18 USC 1091 (a death penalty offense). Please note that the original Convention on the prevention of Genocide notes that government as well as private persons are punishable under these laws, while the US version notes that term as 'whoever'.Additional: I believe the initial contributor may have misread the question. The term being asked for is DISCRIMINATION. See below link and the discussion page:
The forced deportation or destruction in whole or part of an ethnic group . Also the deliberate with holding of food or starvation of such a group. Example Dachau in Nazi Germany. The above could also fit in with Global Warmingby humans in the destruction part . Could fit with Abu Ghraib and Extra ordinary Rendition if that is question
Hazel Cameron has written: 'Britain's hidden role in the Rwandan genocide' -- subject(s): Genocide, Genocide intervention, Responsibility to protect (International law), Principals (Criminal law), Prevention
they are that everyone is fired and they re-elect
Although we would like to prevent all atrocities, it is simply not possible to do so. If the US have the resources and have the international support to help stop atrocities, then it may be justified in some circumstance. But by no means should there be an "obligation". As well, how can we "prevent" atrocities without interfering with other countries soveriengty? Unless there is clear evidence of genocide, we cannot interfere simply based on the grounds of speculative "prevention".
Support for the Jews after World War 2 came in the following ways:The U.N. recognized genocide as a crime in 1948 by adopting the term in "Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide"The U.N. linked human rights and ethics, and universalized basic rights for the peoples of the world. The measure passed unanimously, but some countries abstained from the vote.The Nuremberg Trialls wre held.