Youngstown Sheet & Tube v. Sawyer, 343 US 579 (1952)
Probably the best known, and most controversial, case during Truman's Presidency was the 1952 appeal of Youngstown Sheet & Tube, et al., v. Sawyer, which dealt with Truman's attempt to seize steel manufacturers during the Korean War in order to avert a threatened strike by the United Steel Workers of America. Truman believed a strike would shut down production of military equipment and hamper the US war effort.
During previous wars, the government had successfully nationalized private industry, such as the railroads, telegraph system and Smith & Wesson Co., during WW I, and the railroads (again), coal mines, and trucking operations during WW II. In addition, Truman had seized 28 other properties and industries in 1945-46 to force settlement of labor disputes.
Truman authorized the seizure and government operation of most steel manufacturers on April 8, 1952, without consent of Congress. He also refused to invoke the Taft-Hartley Act, legislation passed in 1947 by a Congressional override of Truman's veto, that mandated an 8-day "cooling off period" during which embattled management and union representatives were supposed to negotiate a settlement.
Owners of the steel mills got a court injunction against the seizure, which the US appealed. The case was heard by the Supreme Court, which declared the President's actions unconstitutional on the grounds that Truman failed to cite any legislative authority permitting the President to exercise "emergency powers" without the consent of Congress.
Is this case still relevant?
Yes. Youngstown is commonly cited in cases where the President exceeds or appears to exceed the powers granted him (or her) by Article II of the Constitution. The basis of this case is whether the President had authority to exercise "emergency powers" without the consent of Congress, and hinges on the "separation of powers" doctrine.
Some recent cases citing Youngstown Sheet & Tube v. Sawyer, (1952)
US Supreme Court
Boumediene v. Bush, 553 US ___ (2008)
Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 US 507 (2004)
Clinton v. City of New York, 524 US 417 (1998)
Clinton v. Jones, 520 US 681 (1997)
US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Motion Systems Corp. v. Bush, 04-1428 (2006)
Tom Sawyer turned white as a sheet when he realized the cave had been sealed up because Injun Joe was still inside and there was no way for him to escape. Tom knew that Injun Joe was dangerous and had a grudge against him, making the situation even more terrifying.
Diane Sawyer married director Mike Nichols in 1988. They are still together today.
The Crucible is still relevant today as mass fear, and political scapegoating still occurs.
Yes it is still relevant in some parts
Yes, it does. Ma Bell is still in most towns and States.
"The old American purposes are still wholly relevant" (John F. Kennedy).Meaning still completely relevant- or still completely of importance.
you could go to google.com and type in ''sheet music for you are still holding on''
No
The Crucible is still relevant today as mass fear, and political scapegoating still occurs.
Of course it's relevant. There are wars happening as we speak.
Relevant in what way exactly? To pop culture? Certainly not in the way it was in its heyday but sure it's still relevant.
Diane Sawyer (born Lila Diane Sawyer on December 22, 1945 in Glasgow, Kentucky) is an American news anchor who is the current main host of ABC World News.