In most cases, the blaster is faster than the Ex, despite the Blaster having 100ccs less than the Ex, it is a 2-stroke which makes it more agile. Stock for stock, the blaster wins. With modded vehicles it could vary. For what I've seen, a full stock blaster is still faster than a slighty modded Ex. It also depends on the rider, too, and the way they shift. Year difference can matter too, like an 89 Blaster vs an 04 Ex, a 15 year old differnce means possible engine problems from age, and less speed. Basically, it depends on many different factors, and what you like to think. Personally Im a Yamaha guy so my thoughts are also torward the Blaster, but not entirely. It just all depends.
yes, i have a raptor 250 and i raced a 300 and beat it easily.
no warriors are twice as fast
The Honda is faster than the Raptor on straights.
It actually all depends on what Acura or Honda car it is. In my opinion, yes. Acura is a luxury car brand of Honda that can actually go faster than the Honda brand.
NO.. a predator is faster
the Honda wins every time
no it is not a wrx is much faster
Honda civic is faster but better?
I know from experence u can make them go faster than 65mph depending on mods
The CBR 200 is a bit faster than the CBR 150 as it is more powerful. However, the difference is not very great.
I've owned both and with both vehicles running good, a Honda is faster, especially the 1985 and 1986 Honda 250r's with liquid cooling. The Kawasaki Tecate was faster than both the Honda and Yamaha.
The Toyota mr2