That depends on who you ask. I a mustang fan so I go with the 5.0 also know as the 302.
BASE Stock for Stock and Drivers being equal:
Stangs had the edge until 1993 when the LT1 came out. Then Camaro held the title until 05 where they were pretty much equal and then Ford takes the crown from '11 onward. I myself have a '95 Camaro and never had issues with any of the Stangs up till '11. The 05-10 give me quite a challenge but remember mine is 15 yrs old. LOL On a side note Ford did create quite a mean Mustang in 03-04 with the Cobra's. They are both fantastic cars however.
Mechanically the cars are almost identical. The determining factor is that the sedan weighs several hundred pounds less than the wagon. Therefore, the sedan is a better choice for performance than the wagon.
a stock ls1 always has more power than a stock lt1
50/50
50/50s are better than the Titan. Trust me. :)
95% the same yes. The Vette had 4 bolt mains vs the Camaro/Firebird 2 Bolt Mains and the vette had SLIGHTLY better intake/exhaust. All in all the Vette Lt1 developed about 25hp more than the Camaro/Firebird version (which can EASILY be caught up to)
50 Cent is better than Kanye West, no doubt.
50 Cent is better than Kanye West, no doubt.
It is around 50 50.
In terms of power the LS1 is better. They dyno 300 to the wheels stock and run low 13's with an experienced driver. The LT1 cars dyno 240-250 and run low 14's/
No
50/50 is recommended so run that.
Yes a lt1 will fit in a 1991, but i believe the motor mounts are a little different for the lt1. You cannot transplant it though without an PCM from an lt1, which needs a 4l60E transmission to control the transmission and engine codes. There are standalone kits available but they cost more than a PCM.