answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Yes, decisions made by a US Court of Appeals Circuit Court are binding only on US District Courts in their territory. They are not binding on state courts or on other federal Circuit or District courts.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Answer

No. What you're describing is called a "Circuit Split," where two or more US Courts of Appeal disagree on the interpretation of federal or constitutional law. The Ninth Circuit has an addition problem in that the Ninth is so large it typically has two 11-judge panels reviewing different cases at the same time. This can result in what's known as an Intra-Circuit Split.

The Supreme Court's goal is consistent understanding and rulings among the lower courts, so if the Ninth Circuit makes one decision and the Fourth Circuit makes a different decision on a substantially similar matter, the US Supreme Court may review the cases and make a final determination. Whatever interpretation the Supreme Court applies is binding on all the Circuit and District Courts.

For more information, see Related Questions, below.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Yes. The Supreme Court would have to take up the case (by granting cert, or certiorari) in order to decide if one circuit's decision should apply to the entire U.S. (all circuits).

For more information, see Related Questions, below.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

It is true that decisions are binding only in each circuit court's territory.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

true

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

6y ago

True ;)

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is a decision in one Circuit binding on another Circuit?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What is a binding decision?

Bind or binding means to impose one or more legal duties on a person or institution. For example, the parties are bound by the terms of the contract; the courts are bound by precedents. The words to bind or binding are also used to signify that a thing is subject to an obligation, engagement or liability; to indenture; to legally obligate to serve. See below link:


What is the process of assigning one network component to work with another?

D. binding


What is the hierarchy of binding precedents within the federal court system?

US Supreme Court decisions are binding on all federal courts, but are most likely to be applicable to cases heard in US District Courts or appealed to US Court of Appeals Circuit Courts. The Supreme Court's decisions are also binding on State courts if they involve constitutional amendments that have been incorporated to the states.US Court of Appeals Circuit Court decisions are binding on all US District Courts within that Circuit, but only carry persuasive precedential weight in other Circuits. The decisions are not binding on other Circuits or on any state courts. US District Court decisions are not binding on other courts, but may be cited as persuasive precedents by other courts, regardless of which Circuit the court belongs to.When US Court of Appeals Circuit Courts issue conflicting decisions on substantially similar matters (called a Circuit Split), they may induce the US Supreme Court to grant certiorari for a case that can be used to resolve or clarify the constitutional issue. The Supreme Court decision will then create a binding precedent used in deciding similar future cases.When Circuit Splits are unresolved, the individual decisions -- although conflicting -- remain binding within each Circuit, but not outside the Circuit. This raises the possibility that one or more of the other ten regional Circuits* will further complicate matters by creating a third split, resulting in inconsistent constitutional interpretations and application of law. For this reason, reviewing cases that address Circuit Splits are high on the US Supreme Court's list of priorities.* The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has special subject matter jurisdiction and is less likely to be affected by decisions made in the regional Circuits.


What is a circuit in which the parts are joined one after another such that the current in each part is the same?

That's a series circuit.


What is the key difference between a parallel circuit and a series circuit?

A series circuit pretty much runs in one direction, with each item which uses a load on that circuit one after another in a series. Should one load go out (a lamp, for example) then the entire series is defunct. A parallel circuit has more than one way to run, has a parallel or tandem circuit, so that if one load (our lamp, again) should fail, the electricity has another path (or more) to get to other loads on the circuit.


In a series circuit of three bulbs adding another one will?

Do nothing. But in a parallel circuit, all the bulbs will get dimmer.


What a circuit is called with more than one path through which electrons can flow?

The alternate paths are said to be "in parallel" (with one another).


You love one person and lust after another - what does one do then?

One makes a pretty tough decision.


What are some characteristics of communities?

Mediation of a dispute can often be employed to avoid an impasse or a law suit over differences. In these events, a trained mediator is hired to gather data and render a decision. In the process, the mediator sits down with one party, listens to testimony and reviews documents and evidence. The session may or may not have a time limit or standards imposed as to the types of documents or evidence that can be presented. When one party finishes, and the mediator understands the position, the mediator invites in another party, and the process is repeated. Once the mediator listens to all the arguments and reviews all the documents and evidence, the mediator makes a decision based on the data presented and renders a decision. Depending on the style of mediation, a decision can be binding or non-binding.


What are Some characteristics of communism?

Mediation of a dispute can often be employed to avoid an impasse or a law suit over differences. In these events, a trained mediator is hired to gather data and render a decision. In the process, the mediator sits down with one party, listens to testimony and reviews documents and evidence. The session may or may not have a time limit or standards imposed as to the types of documents or evidence that can be presented. When one party finishes, and the mediator understands the position, the mediator invites in another party, and the process is repeated. Once the mediator listens to all the arguments and reviews all the documents and evidence, the mediator makes a decision based on the data presented and renders a decision. Depending on the style of mediation, a decision can be binding or non-binding.


What are characteristics of communism?

Mediation of a dispute can often be employed to avoid an impasse or a law suit over differences. In these events, a trained mediator is hired to gather data and render a decision. In the process, the mediator sits down with one party, listens to testimony and reviews documents and evidence. The session may or may not have a time limit or standards imposed as to the types of documents or evidence that can be presented. When one party finishes, and the mediator understands the position, the mediator invites in another party, and the process is repeated. Once the mediator listens to all the arguments and reviews all the documents and evidence, the mediator makes a decision based on the data presented and renders a decision. Depending on the style of mediation, a decision can be binding or non-binding.


What are characteristics of communalism?

Mediation of a dispute can often be employed to avoid an impasse or a law suit over differences. In these events, a trained mediator is hired to gather data and render a decision. In the process, the mediator sits down with one party, listens to testimony and reviews documents and evidence. The session may or may not have a time limit or standards imposed as to the types of documents or evidence that can be presented. When one party finishes, and the mediator understands the position, the mediator invites in another party, and the process is repeated. Once the mediator listens to all the arguments and reviews all the documents and evidence, the mediator makes a decision based on the data presented and renders a decision. Depending on the style of mediation, a decision can be binding or non-binding.