No. In fact, in the real world, a machine with an efficiency of only 100%
isn't even physically possible.
But why isn't an efficiency greater than 100% physically possible ?
Efficiency means (output energy) divided by (input energy) .
If efficiency is greater than 100%, that means output/input is greater than ' 1 ', and
that means that you get more energy out of the machine than you put into it.
Where could that extra energy come from ? Remember the law of conservation
of energy ? It says that energy is never created or destroyed. So you can't get
more energy out of a machine than you put into it, and output/input can't be
more than ' 1 '.
It sure would be nice though: Put some energy into the machine to get it started,
and then just sit back and watch it run. Out of the end comes more energy than
what it takes to run the machine, so you split up the energy that comes out. You
take just enough to keep the machine running, and you put that much back into it.
Then you still have some energy left over, so you take that part and use it to heat
your house, or pump water out of the well, or generate electricity to light your Christmas
lights, or sell it. You'd never need to buy any more energy, or burn any coal or oil or
wood or uranium, because you'd get enough out of the machine to keep it running
plus more energy to use or sell.
Not if the laws of physics - specifically thermodynamics - are correct.
No. That would violate Conservation of Energy, so it follows that it isn't possible.
nope, efficiency o fa machine cannot be greater than 100%...theoretically it shows sometime that efficiency of a machine can be 100%, but practically it cannot be possible as there is some loss of energy is always involved in different ways.
When the output force is greater than the input force on a simple machine, the machine provides a mechanical advantage, making it easier to perform work. This allows the machine to lift or move heavier loads than would be possible with just the input force alone.
There is no such thing. There is no such thing. 1) It costs money to build any machine; you can't build a machine for free. 2) But pressumably, this refers to get energy where there was none before; this is not physically possible.
No, the mechanical advantage is greater than 1. If you input a force of 1 unit you get out a force of 1+ units. However keep in mind that if this were a PERFECT machine the amount of WORK INPUT is EQUAL to the the amount of WORK OUTPUT. Since perfection is not possible, and there are frictional losses this is not possible. Otherwise you could have a perpetual motion machine, which is not yet possible.
The machine shop is needed to physically repair and make products.
No, an efficiency greater than one would not be possible, since that would violate a very fundamental law of physics: conservation of energy. The efficiency of an "ideal machine" would be one, in many cases; the efficiency of an ideal Carnot engine would be less than one.
no
It sure can. A machine as simple as a lever can produce an output force that is greater than the input force. Perhaps you are confusing "force" with "energy"?
You cant it is physically impossible without a machine
That isn't possible, not with a simple machine and not with a complicated machine, since otherwise, conservation of energy would be violated.