answersLogoWhite

0

Is akbar was secular

Updated: 4/27/2024
User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

Best Answer

No , most of it is myth. The way he attacked Rajput kingdoms or make them marry off their daughters to him can not be called tolerant. No Rajput princess would want to spend her life in Mughal harem out of her own will.

"Despite nearly five centuries of Muslim occupation of India, Rajasthan in 1567 CE was still almost entirely Hindu. Akbar infiltrated the area by marrying into Rajasthan's ruling houses and by steadily capturing various forts on the eastern fringe of Rajputana. But the senior house of Rajasthan, Rana of Mewar proudly refused any alliance with Mughals. Akbar's army started a campaign for Chitod in 1567. Rana of Mewar, Uday Singh left his capital, the great fort of Chitod to be defended by 8,000 Rajputs under an excellent commander, Jai Mal, and took himself and his family to the safety of the hills. Akbar arrived on October 24, 1567 and laid a siege of Chitod. Akbar's huge army's camp stretched for almost ten miles . Akbar planned two methods of assault -mining and building a 'sabat', a structure which provides the invading army a cover of a high wall as it progresses 'infinitely slowly' towards the fort wall and tightens the noose around the fort. The mining proved disastrous since an explosion of a mistimed second mine claimed Akbar's nearly 200 men including some leading nobles. As the noose of 'sabat' tightened, Akbar forces lost nearly 200 men a day to musket fire from the fort. Almost four months after the siege, on February 23, 1567, a musket shot fired from the Mughal army killed Jai Mal. Some chroniclers claim that this shot was fired by Akbar himself. With the death of their leader Jai Mal, the Rajputs for a while lost heart. That night flames leapt to the sky as THOUSANDS OF RAJPUT WOMEN PERFORMED JAUHAR (act of self-immolation, the term is a corruption of Jay Har - meaning Hail Shiva). They preferred jumping into a roaring fire, to being captured by Mughal Akbar. Later events do lend credit to their astute judgement. This was the THIRD JAUHAR IN THE HISTORY OF CHITOD.

Next day the Rajputs under a new young leader Patta Singh donned on the saffron robes - Kesariya, in preparation for a fight to death, flung open the gates of the fort and charged on to the Mughal army. Patta Singh, his mother and his wife duly died in the ensuing battle as did many Rajput warriors. Later, the victorious Mughal army entered the fort of Chitod. At the time there were 40,000 Hindu peasants and artisans residing on the fort besides the Rajput army. AKBAR THEN ORDERED A MASSACRE OF ALL THE CAPTURED UNARMED 40,000 HINDUS, some artisans indeed were spared and taken away but THE SLAIN AMOUNTED TO AT LEAST 30,000 Akbar was particularly keen to avenge himself on the thousand musketeers who had done much damage to his troops, but they escaped by the boldest of the tricks. Binding their own women and children, and shoving them roughly along like new captives, the Rajput musketeers successfully passed themselves off as a detachment of the victorious Mughals and so made their way out of the fort .

The MASSACRE OF 30,000 CAPTIVE HINDUS AT CHITOD BY AKBAR has left an indelible blot on his name. No such horrors were perpetrated by even the brutal Ala-ud-din Khilji who had captured the fort in 1303 CE. Abul Fazl, Akbar's court chronicler is at pains in trying to justify this slaughter.

Sir Thomas Roe, an Englishman who visited Chitod some fifty years later, found the fort deserted. In fact, it remained a firm tenet of Mughal policy throughout the next century that fortifications of Chitod, which till then was the capital of the then strongest Hindu Rana, should remain unrepaired, perhaps as a lesson to Hindus who dared to take on the Mughals ."

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

4d ago

Akbar, the Mughal emperor, is often considered a secular ruler for his policies promoting religious tolerance and acceptance of diverse faiths in his empire, including Hinduism, Christianity, and Jainism. He introduced initiatives like the Sulh-i-Kul (peace with all) doctrine in an effort to promote harmony among different religious communities.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is akbar was secular
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Was Emperor Akbar a secular minded person?

Theoretically yes. Honestly no.


What are the good qualities of Akbar the Great?

He was genius and had good vision. Akbar is remembered for his secular image .According to Haig "Akbar was unquestionably the greatest of all rulers of India in Muslim period.


What Muslim leader in India had the most tolerate view of religion?

Akbar


What was akbar's social background like?

The social background of King Akbar was evident from his secular outlook. During his regime, he had Hindu scholars along with Muslims as well to adorn his ministers, advisors list. Not only that, he was religious minded, kind hearted to his country men who used to look after their well beings.


Who is the son of akbar's father?

Akbar's father's son is Akbar (or any brothers Akbar might have.)


Was Akbar a Christian?

No. Akbar was a Muslim.


Where did akbar ruled?

Akbar ruled in India.


Who is the father of akbar?

himayun was the father of akbar


Who is father of akbar?

The father of Akbar was Humayun.


What is the birth name of Travis Akbar?

Travis Akbar's birth name is Travis Peter Akbar.


Who were Akbar's grandsons?

Salim, Murad and Daniyal were the names of Akbar's sons. Salim was later known as Jahangir who succeeded Akbar.


Who built Akbar's tomb?

Akbar's tomb was built by his son, Jahangir, in Sikandra, near Agra, India. It is a blend of Islamic, Hindu, Christian, and Buddhist architectural styles, reflecting Akbar's inclusive approach to religion.