Is cloning good or bad

Answer 1

Cloning is good, because a person with organ disease may not find the perfect organ donor match but if you clone them use the clones organs.

ducklover132's answer:

Why is cloning good?

Debate Profession: Sam and Kassidy

Reason 1: They allow us to clone body parts for those who need it. They allow them to let those people who are supposed to die, live. For instance, let's say all of the sudden Korbyn's heart fails. And all the doctors and nurses search and search for the right kind of heart, but they can't find the right type. And they say the only way that Korbyn can live is to clone her. If Korbyn says no, she dies. If she says yes, she lives. Cloning saves lives.

Reason 2: One of the benefits of cloning isreproducing animals. For instance, what about the tiger and giant panda? They're endangered. What if comes to when only one tiger and giant panda are left on Earth, and the only way to keep them alive is to clone them. So you decide to save the panda and kill the tiger. You might wonder why it would matter, but animals have feelings too. We don't want to die, but neither does the animals. Another reason for reproducing animals is for food. You could clone pigs, cows, and chickens, and end up with more bacon, sausage, hamburgers, and barbeque chicken.

Cloning is bad:)

Answer 2

The answer depends on the nature of the use of the word "clone" and why the object or organism is being cloned. For example, in law enforcement, a "cloned automobile VIN" is ALWAYS bad - so is a "cloned phone." However, in microbiology, clones are the method of reproduction of some organisms and therefore, they are neither good nor bad that is just simply what they are. First define "clone" and put it into context, then determine your criteria for good and bad, and see if your clone fits.

Answer 3

Neither, just one of those practices that requires a great degree of ethical integrity.