No, the word "at" is not needed when asking someone where they live. You can simply ask "Where do you live?"
To live ON an island is correct.
Yes, it is correct to say that you live in the forest if your home is located within the boundaries of a forested area.
In conjunction with
No. If you are trying to say that you have the same opinion as another person, the correct way to say it is "I agree with you."
No, it is not correct.It is correct to say "back home"
No, the correct way is to say "He doesn't live there anymore"
To live ON an island is correct.
No, "such is life".
Yes, it is correct to say that you live in the forest if your home is located within the boundaries of a forested area.
No--at is a preposition, and you technically shouldn't end a sentence with a preposition. In this example, it is sufficient to say "Where do you live?"
It could depend on what it is you are trying to say, but as it is it is grammatically correct.
Depends on how you use it. ========================= I would not say "My daughter and my brother live at Israel", any more than I would say "I live at Chicago".
Yes they do and the correct way to say it is that penguins live in the Arctic therefore they can't live in nests because they no trees.
Both are correct, depending on which end is up. We say, "She and her family live in Boston," and, "We went to see her and her family in Boston."
It depends on what variety of English you speak, I would say either is correct.
It may be correct or incorrect. It depends where you live.
This is an easy mistake to make. The previous answer was correct in saying 'where often' is the correct way to say it as if you were saying 'where often do rabbits live' but you could use were if you were going to say 'Egyptian statues were often big'.