Fossil fuels are non-renewable so have a finite supply. This means that they will eventually run out. They also produce carbon dioxide when burnt which contributes towards global warming. Renewable sources do not pollute the atmosphere and do not run out. Therefore renewable sources are better for the environment, but fossil fuels give more energy per mass. Which is better depends on what you look for, environment and sustainability or high density of energy. Renewable energy still gives out sufficient energy, so renewable sources are better.
Generally they are more convenient and portable. Most of our energy is produced by non renewable sources and society is, presently, adapted to that. Many people would say they were not better, because of the carbon they are putting into the atmosphere. They are cheaper at the moment because few countries have a price on carbon. See the related question below.
Because renewable sources can be replenished (apex) because we will not run out of them
chris brown is the sexiest niogga n this world nd trey songz
Renewable sources of energy, such as solar, wind, and hydropower, are better than non-renewable sources because they produce little to no greenhouse gas emissions, helping to combat climate change. They are sustainable and can be replenished naturally, reducing dependence on finite fossil fuels. Additionally, renewable energy can enhance energy security and create jobs in emerging green industries. Overall, transitioning to renewables promotes a cleaner environment and a more sustainable future.
Because renewable sources can be replenished (apex) because we will not run out of them
they are less expensive They can be used again
Renewable sources of energy are better than nonrenewable sources because they are sustainable and do not deplete finite resources. They also have lower environmental impact, such as reduced greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution. Additionally, renewable energy sources can help increase energy security and create jobs in the clean energy sector.
Renewable sources of energy, such as solar, wind, and hydro, are more sustainable because they are abundant and can be replenished naturally, reducing dependence on finite resources. Unlike non-renewable sources, which emit greenhouse gases and contribute to climate change, renewables produce little to no emissions, leading to cleaner air and a healthier environment. Additionally, investing in renewable energy can enhance energy security and create jobs in emerging industries. Overall, transitioning to renewable energy supports a more sustainable and resilient future.
Renewable energy sources, such as solar, wind, and hydro, are better than nonrenewable sources like fossil fuels because they are sustainable and inexhaustible. They produce little to no greenhouse gas emissions, helping to combat climate change and reduce air pollution. Additionally, renewable energy can enhance energy security by diversifying energy sources and reducing dependence on imported fuels. Overall, transitioning to renewables supports a cleaner, healthier environment and promotes long-term energy resilience.
yes..... renewable is better than non-renewable because you can renew it and it is better for the environment. :)
New energy resources better for the environment are called renewable or alternate energy forms. They include solar, wind, water, hydro, tidal and wave, geothermal, ocean thermal, biomass, biofuel and hydrogen.
Similar to coal, its burnt. But its better because you're burning renewable sources. :D