International law, at least that contained in treaties, is not actual law. Depending on where you're from, it may have a different position in the hierarchy of norms though (i.e. the 'ranking' of the law). Also, international law is generally much more difficult to enforce than national law. Finally, the application of international law is often very much dependent on the political climate. For instance, whether a UN security council resolution has any practical effect on a country upon which sanctions are imposed depends entirely on whether the members of the UN are willing to actively impose them.
Sure, just ask Microsoft which was fined a few million or so.
Money is not the only matter
Another View: No, it is not. In the examp[le cited above Microsoft was tried under the law of THAT country and not under any, so called, International Laws.
International Law is customarily established by treaties or formal agreements beween nations to honor each others laws ESPECIALLY as they apply to international trade and other nation-to-to-nation interactions (e.g.: International maritime law, etc).
IL as be define as the common practice of nations and believe by states as binding on them if they didn't oppose to the customary international law. Even if they are not a party to the convention, and majority of the nation has been practicing it's a common IL binding on all nation. IL is law and it's binding on states which didn't object or if they are not "persistent objector"
Another View: There are some TRUE international laws recognized by virtually all nations (e.g.: Maritime Law - International Diplomatic Immunity - etc). But the true practice of so-called "International Law" as a body of all-encompassing laws that will control the activities of all nations under one umbrella enforcement agency and one single court of judgment is a THEORY. (mostly propounded and supported by "Progressives" and supporters of the "One-World" movement)
No, international law is not "a" true law. It is the name of rules shared internationally, from nation to nation or even world wide. For example, it should be a international law that killing is illegal.
International law is a widely growing theory of law in the present time. there was't any idea of international law in old time. By the growth of the law fields and the dependencies of various states on others it became a very necessity for the mankind.
In the traditional sense of "law", international law is not a law and that's why: law is norms, established by state for people (traditional explanation). that's how it was until 1919, when first international organization, League of Nations, was created. after this, states begun creating norms for themselves too and not for people. This is what we call international law: Law for states established by themselves. It is not for people, except when they act as presidents, ministers, etc.
international law is not areal law
reasons
international law is not command of superior authority
no organised force to enforce the international law
impartial arbitrator is absent
no legislative authority
Grotius
H.L.A Hart, in the "Concept of Law", questions whether international law is really law because it has few rules regarding how international law can be made or changed. This weakness is illustrated in part by the uncertainty surrounding how a customary rule of international law emerges and then when that rule has changed. Not only it is difficult to identify customary rules but, as with other rules of international law, and as opposed to national laws, there are also few mechanisms to enforce and make states obey them. Critically discuss the above propositions.
Anthony A. D'Amato has written: 'Justice and the legal system' -- subject(s): Administration of Justice, Cases, Justice, Justice, Administration of 'International law studies' -- subject(s): International law 'International law coursebook' -- subject(s): International law 'International law' -- subject(s): International law 'Introduction to law and legal thinking' -- subject(s): Law, Philosophy 'The concept of custom in international law' -- subject(s): Customary law, International, International Customary law, International law
International Law is not a real Law, but a positive International Morality.
D. P. O'Connell has written: 'Opinions on imperial constitutional law' -- subject(s): Colonies, Constitutional law 'International law' -- subject(s): International law 'International law for students' -- subject(s): International law 'State succession in municipal law and international law' -- subject(s): State succession
Pitt Cobbett has written: 'Cases and opinions on international law' -- subject(s): Accessible book, Cases, International law 'Leading cases on international law' -- subject(s): Accessible book, Cases, International law, International law and relations
Prue Taylor has written: 'An ecological approach to international law' -- subject(s): Common heritage of mankind (International law), Environmental law, International, Global warming, International Environmental law, Law and legislation
yes,i can。i teach international law in China。
International Law Commission was created in 1948.
International Law Association was created in 1873.
Elements of International Law was created in 1836.
Copyright infringement is against international law.
L. C. Green has written: 'Law and society' -- subject(s): International law, Sociological jurisprudence 'International law' -- subject(s): International law 'The Tehran embassy incident and international law' -- subject(s): Foreign relations, Hostages, Terrorism 'The position of the individual in international law' -- subject(s): Human rights, International law 'The Dynamic Principles of Financial Control' 'Essays on the modern law of war' -- subject(s): Addresses, essays, lectures, War (International law) 'The contemporary law of armed conflict' -- subject(s): War (International law)