0
Is it better to use one more powerful processor or multiple less powerful processors for my PC?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
It is better to use one more powerful processor for responsiveness. Consider this: you have two processors that process some transaction at a rate 1 transaction per second. They would process two transaction in one second each resulting in 1 second average response time and throughput of 2 transactions/sec. Now if you have another single processor that is twice as fast as the other two and it has to process the same two transactions then results will be a little different. It would finish the first transaction in 0.5 second and the the second in another 0.5 second resulting in the same throughput - 2 transaction/sec but 0.75 average response time.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Which is better Celeron processor or Atom processor?
A Celeron processor. Some Celeron processors are somewhat powerful, however Atom processors are slower, intended for basic use in ultra-mobile machines such as netbooks.
Are Intel processors better than AMD ones in desktop computers?
Whether Intel or AMD processors are better for desktop computers depends on your individual needs and preferences. Intel processors are generally considered to be better for gaming and other demanding applications. They tend to have higher clock speeds and more cores than AMD processors. This makes them better at handling multiple tasks at the same time. AMD processors are generally considered to be better for budget-minded users and for tasks that are not as demanding, such as web browsing and office work. They tend to be more affordable than Intel processors and they offer better value for money. If you are a gamer or a creative professional who needs a high-performance processor, then an Intel processor is the better choice. However, if you are on a budget or if you do not need a processor for demanding applications, then an AMD processor is a good option. Ultimately, the best way to decide which processor is right for you is to consider your individual needs and preferences.
Which processor should be given to andro humanoid robot?
Pentium Ultracore Millemia V2Another PerspectiveA better solution would be to use multiple processors that are networked together in a way that forms a neural net, with each processor controlling different functions. In that situation, the processor is not as important as the programming. But some would suggest that the Motorola 68000 series processor would be more powerful and provide more functionality for such an application.
Why not just design a single powerful processor instead of many workstation in parallel?
one single powerful processor consumes more energy generates more heat then multi-core processors ,A multi core processor will also be faster since there are multiple processors to handle the data manipulation instead of having to use time sharing.
Is a motherboard with two processors better than a motherboard with one dual core processor?
It depends on model. Some motherboards support two processors with four cores each. Usually two processors systems are used for server applications or as a workstations and do not work well as gaming stations. When usual desktops can have one dual core processor and perform better in gaming than the workstations.
Why use many powerful processors working in parallel?
Don't let their speed in Ghz fool you: each core in a multi-core processor is more powerful than a processor of the previous generation. The motivation for using processors at a lower clock rate and use them in parallel is to 1.) reduce heat and electrical requirements, and 2.) to facilitate better performance for apllications by creating more hardware thread
Is a dual processor CPU better?
Whether or not you get any benefit from a dual core processor over a single core processor depends on what operating system and what programs you are running. Newer operating systems (Windows 7, Mac OSX) do use multicore processors. Also, using multiple programs on a computer will better utilize a multicore processor. In short, yes it can make a difference for today's average user.
Whats Processor is better one with a 32 bit or one with 1.4 GHZ?
A 1.4 GHZ Processor can be a 32-bit processor, but it can also be a 64-bit processor. The distinction between 32-bit vs 64-bit and the speed are two completely different things. In general, when looking for a processor - keep these things in mind: 64-bit is better than 32-bit, assuming you are running a 64-bit operating system on the 64-bit processor. Running a 32-bit OS on a 64-bit processor is fine, but you will not get any benefits from having a 64-bit processor in those situations. Multi-core processors are better than single core processors. Having multiple cores is similar (though not the same) as having multiple processors. They can process more tasks in the same amount of time. In general, if you can get a dual core or a quad core - you'll be better off. Lastly, speed is also important. The higher the speed (i.e. 1.4 GHZ, 1.8 GHZ et. al.) the faster the processor can get things done. If you are shopping for a processor to put in a specific system board, you must make sure you get the proper type of processor. If you have a system board that is designed for an Intel processor, an AMD processor will likely not work. You need to determine the socket type and supported processors for your system before deciding on one.
Why are Intel processors said to be better processors than AMD processors?
In many ways the AMD processor is considered to be significantly better than the Intel. Intel is attempting to improve their image by adding new features, and AMD is doing much the same.
What are cores on micro processors?
The "core" in a processor is the microprocessor inside of the CPU(Central Processing Unit). For example, if you have a Dual Core CPU then you have 2 microprocessors inside of the CPU, this allows you to do two things at once, as a microprocessor can only do one thing at a time the only exception to this is Multi-Threading which allows one core to do the work of multiple cores, but its not as fast as having multiple cores.
Do Intel CPU processors have a better cost to performance ratio?
Intel CPU processors have a very stable price, they don't differ a lot from the CPU processors of AMD but AMD has more discount offers on it's CPU processors which in some occassions give them a better cost to performance ratio. In other words, buying an AMD processor with a good discount might just beat the Intel CPU processor cost to performance ratio.
Why use many not-so-powerful processors in parallel?
Don't let their speed in Ghz fool you: each core in a multi-core processor is more powerful than a processor of the previous generation. The motivation for using processors at a lower clock rate and use them in parallel is to 1.) reduce heat and electrical requirements, and 2.) to facilitate better performance for apllications by creating more hardware thread
