'Would' implies a sort-of hypothetical; something like an 'if; then' statement. For example, "If I didn't have any money, what would I do?"
So 'would it be' can work as future tense or as present tense, as long as there is something like a hypothetical in the statement being made. For example, "Would it be fine with you if I went to the shops tomorrow?" is a sort-of hypothetical future tense statement, while "Would it be fine with you if I was jumping now?" is a sort-of hypothetical present tense statement.
It can work as future tense, but not quite as most future tense things do, so I'd need to know the sentence it's in to answer for sure.
Yes, "would it be" is grammatically correct when used in the future tense to express possibility or uncertainty. For example, "Would it be possible to meet tomorrow?" or "Would it be OK if I called you later?"
No, it is not grammatically correct. The correct form would be "Stop or you will be bitten."
Not at allAnother answer:If you mean 'Is the clause "you were" correct grammar?' the answer is 'yes'.If you mean 'Is the clause "is you were" correct grammar?' the answer is 'no'.If you had taken the trouble to write your question more clearly, you would have helped the people who you hoped would be helping you. Isn't that worth doing?
"Would be" is both a future tense and a conditional
No, "will be had" is not a correct grammar. The correct grammar would be "will have."
Were is a past tense form of be. The future tense of be is will be.
Correct grammar would be (present tense) "are you doing your shopping", or (past tense) "have you done your shopping".
No, it is not grammatically correct. The correct form would be "Stop or you will be bitten."
To my knowledge past tense would be convenient.
Not at allAnother answer:If you mean 'Is the clause "you were" correct grammar?' the answer is 'yes'.If you mean 'Is the clause "is you were" correct grammar?' the answer is 'no'.If you had taken the trouble to write your question more clearly, you would have helped the people who you hoped would be helping you. Isn't that worth doing?
No, "will be had" is not a correct grammar. The correct grammar would be "will have."
The correct phrase is "It would not have fit." This is the proper use of the past perfect tense with the verb "fit."
No. The correct grammar is "would give"
Were is a past tense form of be. The future tense of be is will be.
"Would be" is both a future tense and a conditional
No. That is the present tense; the future tense of that would be 'we will become', and the past tense would be 'we have become' or 'we became'.
No, "slide" is the present tense. The future tense would be "will slide".
No. As 'you' refers to either second person singular or plural noun, it takes a plural verb of 'to be'. As you want to refer to the past tense in your sentence, the plural verb of 'to be' in the past tense is 'were'. The correct sentence should be like this: You were not there.