"I had gone for dinner" can be used to say: (past tense) that you went out to get dinner and bring it back - you could instead say: I had gone to get dinner. Alternatively, it could mean (past tense) that you went out to eat dinner - you might want to say: I had gone out to eat dinner. Or, it could mean (past tense) that you were not there for dinner - in this case, a different phrasing could be: I had gone and would not be there for dinner, or, I had gone at dinner time. Please add a comment if you found this helpful, or would like to know more. :)
Yes. No, it is not. Usually, you say you are going to "have" dinner, or "eat" dinner. eg. I am going to have dinner at 8 o'clock tonight. You are going to eat dinner, even if you are sick. To "take" dinner brings up the image of one "taking," or "stealing," someone else's dinner. Hope this helps !
Yes, it is correct. "Eating dinner" is a common phrase used to describe the action of consuming the evening meal.
Have gone is correct
My family and I is correct before a verb. (nominative case) My family and me is correct after a verb or preposition. (objective case) When deciding on whether to use "I" or "me" in a sentence, you take out the other person(s) and see what would be used. For example, if you were to say "My family and I went to dinner," you take out family and it would read "I went to dinner." "Me went to dinner" doesn't sound right. However, if you were to say "John wanted to go to dinner with my family and I," and take out family, you would be saying "John wanted to go to dinner with I." "I" does not fit here and is grammatically incorrect. The sentence should read "John wants to go to dinner with my family and me." You can do this with any personal pronoun such as we/us, he/him, she/her, or they/them. "She and I went to town." = She went to town. OR I went to town.
My family and I is correct before a verb. (nominative case) My family and me is correct after a verb or preposition. (objective case) When deciding on whether to use "I" or "me" in a sentence, you take out the other person(s) and see what would be used. For example, if you were to say "My family and I went to dinner," you take out family and it would read "I went to dinner." "Me went to dinner" doesn't sound right. However, if you were to say "John wanted to go to dinner with my family and I," and take out family, you would be saying "John wanted to go to dinner with I." "I" does not fit here and is grammatically incorrect. The sentence should read "John wants to go to dinner with my family and me." You can do this with any personal pronoun such as we/us, he/him, she/her, or they/them. "She and I went to town." = She went to town. OR I went to town.
My family and I is correct before a verb. (nominative case) My family and me is correct after a verb or preposition. (objective case) When deciding on whether to use "I" or "me" in a sentence, you take out the other person(s) and see what would be used. For example, if you were to say "My family and I went to dinner," you take out family and it would read "I went to dinner." "Me went to dinner" doesn't sound right. However, if you were to say "John wanted to go to dinner with my family and I," and take out family, you would be saying "John wanted to go to dinner with I." "I" does not fit here and is grammatically incorrect. The sentence should read "John wants to go to dinner with my family and me." You can do this with any personal pronoun such as we/us, he/him, she/her, or they/them. "She and I went to town." = She went to town. OR I went to town.
It depends on the sentence. Always take out the "mommy" and see how the sentence sounds. For example: "There was a nice dinner awaiting mommy and me when we arrived". Change it to "There was a nice dinner awaiting me when I arrived" That is correct. Now try this: " Mommy and me went to the movies". Again, take out "mommy". It becomes "Me went to the movies", which is wrong.
Absolutely. You can say it that way, or you can say "These dogs have gone to deaf people's homes." Either is fine.
Over, meaning "ended" is used when referring to things that take some time and then come to an end, such as meals or tennis matches. For things that occur in quantities that can be exhausted, like food, "over" would not be used. "That food is over" is grammatically correct but meaningless except as a Valley Girl slang way of saying "That cuisine is no longer fashionable." If you mean there is no more of something, hamburgers for example, we say The burgers are gone or we're out of burgers. If you mean the meal has ended, dinner for example, we say Dinner is over.
yes
If what you're trying to say is a question- 'Has the bell gone?', then yes, that's correct. (Make sure you put a question mark at the end)
yes