In the simplest terms, evolution is synonymous with change. Life without change is stagnation; stagnation is the first step on the journey to death.
Try it this way: one of the least avoidable laws of nature and physics is entropy. It cannot be delayed, it cannot be denied. Entropy is change, and is likely a huge component of evolution.
So, short answer, no. Life would end without evolution.
Yes, humanists generally accept the theory of evolution as supported by scientific evidence. Evolution is considered a fundamental concept in humanist thought as it provides a natural explanation for the development of life on Earth without the need for supernatural intervention.
There are no official announcements or confirmations about a "Rotten School 17" at the moment. Without official updates, it's uncertain if the series will continue.
For today's kids ? No. For the people that lived before computers were even invented ? Yes.
While language plays a significant role in expressing culture, it is still possible to share aspects of a culture without sharing the same language. Cultural exchange can occur through food, art, music, and traditions that transcend language barriers and enable people to connect and understand each other's cultures.
A possible antonym for "strategies" could be "spontaneity" or "randomness," as these terms suggest actions taken without careful planning or deliberate thought.
Something that is 'sustained' lasts (prolonged for an extended period or without interruption) - therefore a sustained effect would be an effect that lasted.
Without mutation there can be no evolution. Without evolution there can be no speciation.
Not biological evolution in the standard sense. No variation, genetic variability, and there is nothing for natural selection to select from.
Actually, it's life that has helped evolution to continue - or perhaps one might regard life and evolution as parts of the same complex thing. It's certainly impossible to consider one without the other.Evolution has helped life to adapt to changing circumstances, such as shifts in climates, or drifts in geology and geography, through natural selection - the weeding out of less reproductively fit variants.
No, evolution is not over. Whenever the environment changes, and it is changing all the time, life has to adapt. Even without environmental change, slow, gradual honing of species to their niches would continue, and there is also the matter of genetic drift.
The planets would continue to exist. However, life as we know it would not be possible.
Something that is 'sustained' lasts (prolonged for an extended period or without interruption) - therefore a sustained effect would be an effect that lasted.
No, but adaptive change would be difficult. Remember, evolution is the change in allele frequency over time in a population of organisms. Mutation, genetic drift, genetic flow and other processes would continue without natural selection.
Perhaps not, but evolution can exist without natural selection.
Tetany (or tetanus, not to be confused with the disease called tetanus) is sustained contraction without any evidence of relaxation, often due to repeated stimulation.
No. Evolution is defined, in its simplest form, as descent with modification. So reproduction is an essential part of the definition of evolution.
Without evolution, the human race would still be swinging through the trees.