0
Is it possible that different conclusion can be inferred from the same evidence?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Yes. The evidence is presented in a courtroom. The jury hears it. The prosecutor presents his conclusion to the jury. The defense attorney presents his conclusion to the jury. The judge gives instructions to the jury. The jury goes to the jury room. The jury returns with the verdict. The term verdict is a fancy term for conclusion.
Both sides heard the same evidence. The prosecutor presented evidence. The defense attorney presented evidence.
In some cases there is a hung jury. That means one or more jurors heard the evidence and disagreed with the others and would not change his or her mind.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What makes an inference different from proof?
A proof assumes that there is only one correct answer/conclusion to a series of logical statements. An inference is also a conclusion, but it is possible that the connection from fact to conclusion could be interpreted differently by different people.
Why is it not possible or possible to roll your tongue?
Different people inherit different muscles. Some folks can, some can't. There is some evidence that it may even be genetic.
How can such apparently reliable evidence lead an auditor to an improper conclusion?
The auditor apparently is misinterpreting the reliable evidence presented to them. It would be advisable to have an experienced, licensed (CPA/EA) tax representative working for you to aid in this matter. Taxpayers such as yourself often mislead auditors with how they present information to them.
A possible explanation or answer to a question?
conclusion
Is it possible to have only a predicate in a sentence?
A sentence must have a subject and predicate to be a sentence. The exception is when the subject is inferred. "going to the sale" is not a sentence. It needs a subject. We are going to the sale. is a sentence. Speaking to another person, "Stay here" is a sentence. The subject "you" is inferred.
What are the posisible conclusion about family planning?
There are many possible conclusions about family planning. There are different methods of family planning and bodies will react differently to any of the methods taken up.
Do conclusions that are not logically supported invalidate the entire study?
Not necessarily. A conclusion can still be valid if there is no logically possible solution where the premise is true and the conclusion is false.
What does reconstruction evidence mean?
It refers to using the evidence available to 'reconstruct,' insofar as possible, what happened during the offense.
Why it is important that there is only one possible explanation for experimental data?
If more than one explanation is possible, a conclusion about one of them cannot be reliable
List and explain three reasons why it is not possible to define a simple analytical scheme that can be applied to all types of evidence?
I'm actually doing this homework and what I found to be the answers: - scientist cannot determine quantity or quality of evidence thus not all standard tests can be conducted -conclusion of origin of a specific item must be made by the practical experience of the examiner - don't know a third
Is a possible conclusion about an observation?
This is a question of Theoretical Philosophy. *It varies. Please see English language.
Has aliens landed on earth?
It is possible, but so far there is no evidence that this has happened.
