A parental guardian is, in fact, primarily responsible for appropriately guiding a child through life into adulthood. However, that guardian is NOT responsible for any willful actions committed by the child unless there is proof that the child is guided specifically to the end that a crime is committed.
Depends on the state and crime. Also if the parent could have prevented it.
if parents cannot give time to care their children & leave them alone then such children can become stressed & we all know"empty mind, devils home"
so they commit different crimes and may also take help of drugs
mostly westerns are quite busy in work & can't seek their children & such condition may be deadly to their children
It depends on the factors that lead to that crime and the degree of seriousness. If law enforcement officials and courts decide that the parents had either a) something to do with their child's behavior or b) could have reasonable taken steps to prevent the crime from happening than the parents of a child who committed a crime can be held accountable.
In some cases where the child is young the parents may be dealt with by the state more harshly than the child themselves. Parents can become responsible for the acts of their children but that does not necessarily mean that the child gets off without punishment. The parents can be charged separately with a similar crime or even charged with crimes such as criminal negligence, neglect, child abuse and accessory.
The law is interesting in that it is interpreted many different ways by many different judges. Depending on the circumstances of each individual case parents may or may not be responsible for the crimes their children commit.
You could be held responsible in a court of law
violent carton,teacher,parents
Claudius commits no crime in Act III. He is, however, forced to consider his previous crime of murdering his brother.
Yes of course if they are under the age of prosecution. The parent is the legal guardian of the child so is responsible for that child's actions. Yes and they should because if someone did that to get them in trouble they will be mad n day be getting prank and shi t so yea
because some people who are accused might be innocent.
It is not a legal crime if parents kick out children who have attained maturity and are independent citizens with freedom in a democratic setup. It may not a social crime if the child is prodigal who makes life of his/her parents miserable. A family is a social institution with shared responsibilities & benefits .If a member of any social institution neclects his/her responsibility then he/she has no right for the benefits.
They are not responsible for the crime of a 20 year old person no matter where the person lives, unless they somehow helped commit the crime in some way.
Your parents remain responsible for your welfare until you turn 18. They are responsible for insuring that you obey the law and are housed and clothed properly. If the minor commits a crime, they may be brought up on criminal charges as an adult, depending on what the prosecutor says.
In Maryland, parents are generally not legally responsible for their children once they turn 18. At this age, individuals are considered legal adults and are responsible for themselves. However, parents may still have responsibilities if they have a legal agreement in place that extends their parental obligations beyond the age of 18.
yeah because the parents of the child trusted the other parents to take care of their son/daughter
"He who permits evil commits evil" basically means that a bystander is just as responsible as someone who actually commits a crime. It's hard to argue that a bystander is exactly as responsible, but if people do not speak up against crime, then they are allowing these crimes to be commited.
Commits- like: she commits a crime.
A child in the UK becomes legally responsible at the age of 10. At this age, the law says that the child was fully aware of the crime they were committing. They can be held legally responsible for their actions. The type of crime they commit depends on what type of sentence they receive.
If you are an adult and your child commits a crime you can and will be held liable for there actions if you knew they were committing the action or failed to act in a reasonable manner to stop them and did not report them. You can also be held liable for any damages they caused committing an illegal act. As a parent you are legally responsible not only for the actions that they conduct but the damage they inflict. You are responsible for their school attendance and for them complying to any and all state issued mandates after the fact. If you feel that you can not control your child or that you can not prevent them from committing illegal acts, it is best that you turn them over to the states juvenile program as an unruly child to prevent you from being held liable for their actions.
If the child has the same understanding and commits a crime as an adult, then issuing a sentence that fits the crime is appropriate.
violent carton,teacher,parents
No, the parents may be fined for child negligence, but that's about it. Children can have charges put on a juvenile record, as well can be sent to a juvenile correction institution for a short period of time depending on the severity of their crime.
Yes, a person that commits a crime has a choice to choose a lawyer or represent themselves.