answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

This is false. The movement described is a disadvantageof bubble sort.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is it trueThe biggest advantage of the bubble sort algorithm is that values move only by one element at a time toward their final destination in the array?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How do you search a particular element from the vector?

To search a particular element from the vector, use the find() algorithm. If the vector is sorted, you can use the binary_search() algorithm to improve efficiency. Both algorithms can be found in the <algorithm> header in the C++ standard library.


3 Write the algorithm of inserting an element at middle of a linked?

theory part to how u can insert element at middle of link list ?


Why is hassium considered as the biggest element?

Hassium is not considered as the biggest elements.


Who introduce selection sorting algorithm?

in selection sorting at first we take first element of the list and start comparing with all the successive element of that list


What element is the biggest occurring element?

If you mean the most common or 'ubiquitous' element, then it is hydrogen (H).


Randomized quicksort algorithm in c language?

Instead of choosing the last element of every sub array as the pivot, we choose a random element in Randomized version and swap it with the last element before partitioning.


Which are the searching algorithm always compare the middle element with the searching elements in the given array?

binary search system


What is the biggest element in the alkali family?

Francium has the biggest atomic weight and the biggest atomic radius between the alkali metals.


What algorithm uses a loop to step through each element of an array starting with the first element searching for a value?

What you're describing is called a sequential search or linear search.


Is gallium bigger than potassium?

if i remember correctly, the element which has the biggest atomic number is the biggest.


Why not use seconds to evaluate algorithm's effectiveness?

An algorithm cannot be measured in seconds because:* timing will be different on different machines * timing will be different on the same machine in a different configuration * when an algorithm takes n seconds to complete, that only holds true for one set of inputThe biggest problem up there is that timing an algorithm only gives us information about one output for a specific input. What we really want to know is how well the algorithm will scalewith input. If you double the number of values you send as input will your algorithm take twice as long? Four times? Will it not scale linearly?In computer science we use what is known as "Big O notation" to describe how well an algorithm scales. Let's look at some common examples:Linear search can be represented in Big O as O(n). This is because the algorithm searches through each element in your list one at a time until it finds the target value. For a list of any size n, it will make n comparisons.Selection sort can be represented as O(n2) for the same reason. For a list of size n, each element will need to be compared to each other element, giving us n*n comparisons.More complex algorithms have more difficult evaluations.A binary search algorithm will cut the amount of data it needs to search in half on each iteration. This gives us O(log n).


What is the worst case running time of algorithm to delete each element from the linked list?

Linear time. O(n).