Compared to what?
Total American casualties in WW1 were significantly lower than either WW2 or the US Civil War, and the casualty rate (number of casualties suffered per 100,000 deployed) was lower than most wars Americans fought in during the 1800s.
American casualty rates were comparable to (though slightly higher than) British or French rates during the same time period.
No, American casualties in World War II were significantly higher than in World War I. In World War I, the United States suffered around 116,500 casualties, including approximately 53,400 deaths. In contrast, during World War II, the United States had roughly 416,800 deaths, with total casualties exceeding 1.1 million.
True
It is true.
True
I think it would be true
true
True
it caused high civilian casualties but did not result in surrender
no it is not true. American sports are being played all around the world. Canada happens to be big on sports which includes American sports.
The American economy became the world's strongest.
it caused high civilian casualties but did not result in surrender
The economy didn't drop even more it sky rocketed because of new employment for women.
You can learn more about Adyashanti online. He is an American born spiritual teacher that awakens all beings. He is also the author of "Falling into Grace," "True Meditation," and "The End of Your World."
your mom that is true kids be-leave it
true
It caused high civilian casualties but didn't result in surrender.
its true
True