No.
It was never put in in the Hebrew literature.
The Bible view is true and the Greek view is false. There is always some mixed truth in a lie, but why go to a lie when you have the truth before you?
God is the true author of the Bible. He used men to pen the Bible
In the King James version the word - Hades - does not appear at all. Hades is both the Greek word for the 'underworld' and the name of its God. The King James version uses the word - Hell - for that place. the word - hell - appears 54 times Actually, that's not true. I have the New King James Version and "Hades" is mentioned at least twice in Revelations.
Yes, it is the oldest English translated Bible.Answer:The first true English Bible is Wycliffe's translation published in 1382. Tyndale's Bible, which was more accurate was published in 1525. Other English translations prior to The King James version (published 1611) include the Coverdale Bible (1535), Roger's Bible (1537), and the Geneva Bible (1560).
A:There is no one 'true' version of the Bible. All Christian Bibles reflect the errors and interpolations (later insertions by unknown authors) that crept into the scriptures over time. They all largely rely on the Septuagint for their reading of the Hebrew Bible, thus incorporating the translation errors inherent to the Septuagint. Among English translations of the Bible: The King James Version (KJV) is the most popular Bible among Protestants, but this was a compromise. King James told his scholars to keep the Bible consistent with the earlier Bishop's Bible as far as possible. The Authorised Version of the KJV uses italics to mark text that is not a literal translation of what the scholars believed to be the original, or where they were unsure of the correct translation. It is also known to contain further translation errors.The Revised Standard Version (RSV) was an American revision of the Authorised King James Version, remaining faithful to its antecedent where possible. Despite the occasionally stilted Bible English, some say it was the best Bible for study purposes.The NRSV is an ecumenical version that has replaced the RSV. Its language is more inclusive, with less old English, but it is considered a less literal translation. A Catholic Edition NRSV has the Deuterocanonical Books of the Catholic Bible inserted.The New International Version (NIV), sponsored by the New York International Bible Society, is considered a conservative alternative to the RSV, but is not as literal as the RSV.The New English Bible (NEB) was produced by the Protestant churches of the United Kingdom in contemporary British English. The REB (1989), a thorough reworking of the NEB, with a much improved Old Testament.The New American Bible (NAB) is a Roman Catholic translation, done with Protestant cooperation. The New Testament section was revised and improved in 1987.The New Jerusalem Jerusalem Bible is another Roman Catholic translation, an improved version of the Jerusalem Bible.
true
There is no such statement in the Bible, the Bible says nothing about God's true name being lost.
The Bible view is true and the Greek view is false. There is always some mixed truth in a lie, but why go to a lie when you have the truth before you?
Christian. The Bible is the authoritative book of teaching for Christians. A Bible church, if it is true to its name will put its emphasis on following the Bible.
No that is they name of a greek god in mythology..] The name of the true God is Jehovah.... Says that in the bible book of Psalms 83:18
Esther (Hadassah)
True
In Biblical days there was no religion. The people of the Bible were called Hebrews and Israelites. It was not a religion- its what they were.
Thomas Jefferson cut and pasted parts of the Gospels together to form a version of the teachings and life of Jesus. Mostly he removed the accounts of miracles. His book is in print today under the name, The Jefferson Bible.
none of them are true. The Quran is the true book of god.
AnswerTruth has many meanings. Is the Bible historically true? Is it scientifically true? Is it theologically true?Scholars have shown that the Bible is frequently not true on matters of history. So you can not be sure that any statement about historical events is true, unless confirmed independently.The Bible is clearly not true scientifically. The sun and stars were not really created after the earth already existed, nor were they placed in a 'firmament' just above the earth. Grass could not have lived, even for a second, before the sun existed. But the ancients simply did not know this.Whether or not the Bible is true on matters of religion depends on faith. However, it must be recognised that many books of the Bible are now known to have been altered or added to, sometimes quite significantly, long after they were first written. Which version is theologically true - the original, or the version that is now used in most modern Bibles? Ans since the Bible is often interpreted in ways that may not have been apparent to the ancients, we need to know which interpretation is theologically correct.
God is the true author of the Bible. He used men to pen the Bible