The Bible view is true and the Greek view is false. There is always some mixed truth in a lie, but why go to a lie when you have the truth before you?
No. It was never put in in the Hebrew literature.
King James Version New International Version Revised Standard Version The Living Bible New Living Translation World English Bible New King James Version New International Readers Editions American Standard Version New American Standard Version Young's Literal Translation Plain English Bible New English Bible Amplified Bible Basic English Bible Translator's NT 20th Century Bible Modern King James Version The Message New Jerusalem Bible Hebrew Names Version of World English Bible Contemporary English Version English Version for the Death Good News Version New Century Version New Revised Standard Version J. B. Phillips New Testament, modern English
There doesn't seem to be anyone in the Bible whose name translates as keeper.
They use it but it is not the only version of the Bible they use.
The Bible view is true and the Greek view is false. There is always some mixed truth in a lie, but why go to a lie when you have the truth before you?
No. It was never put in in the Hebrew literature.
The New International Version of the Bible NIV and the New King James Version of the Bible NKJV.
King James Version New International Version Revised Standard Version The Living Bible New Living Translation World English Bible New King James Version New International Readers Editions American Standard Version New American Standard Version Young's Literal Translation Plain English Bible New English Bible Amplified Bible Basic English Bible Translator's NT 20th Century Bible Modern King James Version The Message New Jerusalem Bible Hebrew Names Version of World English Bible Contemporary English Version English Version for the Death Good News Version New Century Version New Revised Standard Version J. B. Phillips New Testament, modern English
There doesn't seem to be anyone in the Bible whose name translates as keeper.
Lü Zhenzhong's version of the Bible was created in 1970.
They use it but it is not the only version of the Bible they use.
none of them are true. The Quran is the true book of god.
Yes, there were six other English versions of The Bible prior to the King James version. They were, in order of oldest to the most recent, the Tyndale Bible, the Coverdale Bible, the Matthew Bible, the Gret Bible, the Geneva Bible, and the Bishops Bible.
Matthew 1:5 - "Salmon the father of Boaz, whose mother was Rahab, Boaz the father of Obed, whose mother was Ruth, Obed the father of Jesse"
AnswerTruth has many meanings. Is the Bible historically true? Is it scientifically true? Is it theologically true?Scholars have shown that the Bible is frequently not true on matters of history. So you can not be sure that any statement about historical events is true, unless confirmed independently.The Bible is clearly not true scientifically. The sun and stars were not really created after the earth already existed, nor were they placed in a 'firmament' just above the earth. Grass could not have lived, even for a second, before the sun existed. But the ancients simply did not know this.Whether or not the Bible is true on matters of religion depends on faith. However, it must be recognised that many books of the Bible are now known to have been altered or added to, sometimes quite significantly, long after they were first written. Which version is theologically true - the original, or the version that is now used in most modern Bibles? Ans since the Bible is often interpreted in ways that may not have been apparent to the ancients, we need to know which interpretation is theologically correct.
Yes, there were six other English versions of the Bible prior to the King James version. They were, in order of oldest to the most recent, the Tyndale Bible, the Coverdale Bible, the Matthew Bible, the Gret Bible, the Geneva Bible, and the Bishops Bible.