Want this question answered?
The South advocated Slavery and States Rights.
The abolitionist did not help the war start, actually, the Civil War started because of States' Rights, Slavery, and Sectionalism/seccession. They could fall under the category of slavery but they were only a mild influence.
Get womens equal rights and abolish slavery.♥ Get womens equal rights and abolish slavery.♥
The Egalitarian movement favored equality for all people. Its ideas were that people should have equal economic, social, and civil rights. During this movement, Northen states abolished slavery.
1.economic and social differences between the north and south 2. states rights vs. federal rights 3.fight between pro-slavery and abolition 4.growth of the abolition movement 5.the election of 1980-Abraham Lincoln
Secession- where they thought of their state before their country. Slavery. states' rights. sectionalism. election of 1860.
i dont have a bloody clue. Any geeks out there?
"Anti-equal rights" refers to opposition to the principle that all individuals should have the same rights and opportunities. "Anti-slavery" opposes the practice of enslaving individuals based on race, while "anti-equal rights" resists efforts to ensure that all individuals, regardless of race, gender, or other factors, have equal rights and opportunities in society. The key difference is that anti-slavery focuses on ending a specific form of oppression, while anti-equal rights resists broader efforts to achieve equality for all.
No. The root causes of the American Civil War were economic (taxation) and political (states' rights).
People may agree to slavery due to coercion, manipulation, threat of violence, lack of education or awareness of their rights, or economic vulnerability. In many cases, people are forced into slavery against their will, and their agreement is not truly voluntary.
The South advocated Slavery and States Rights.
Officially for the States Right but actually for States Right and to protect their way of life, which included also the slavery.
No, not like the south. It was an economic slavery where people were paid very little and treated poorly. African Americans still didn't have rights but were more free than their counterparts in the south.
For women rights and slavery For women rights and slavery
yes - No, it's not. Children in child labour have (some) rights and do get paid, but just a little. Whenever the word slavery comes up it means; (simply/almost) no rights, and no payment.
the ways in which social and economic problems are solved
1.economic and social differences between the north and south 2. states rights vs. federal rights 3.fight between pro-slavery and abolition 4.growth of the abolition movement 5.the election of 1980-Abraham Lincoln