Yes; rights are controlled by Alcoholics Anonymous.
"Yes, alcoholism information can be very beneficial to alcoholics over the long term. Knowledge is our best weapon to combat disease and addiction. Alcoholics Anonymous can assist with this material."
Yes; they would be considered to be "literary works" as long as they contain exclusively original material.
Censorship can be used to remove copyright material if the material does not belong to you.
The copyright holder, or anyone the copyright holder authorizes.
It can be. Notification is not required for protection.
No. A name is a trademark as in a business . Copyright is a protection of written material. Your name is not written material.
"Copyright obtained" is an unnecessarily wordy way of saying the material is protected by copyright.
In most cases, no, this would not be allowed. Building upon copyrighted content may still be considered a violation of the copyright owner's copyright. For example, creating covers for songs.
All created material is copyright, whether commercially generated or not. Making a copy of any copyright material is against copyright laws in most jurisdictions. Distributing such material is considered more serious but it is the copying that is against the law. Making a custom disc is therefore in breach of copyright. WikiAnswers cannot endorse or condone any breach of the law. One might consider if the owner of the copyright material would approve of the copying or not. If there is no commercial loss for anyone, the copyright holder may well ignore the breach.
Once copyright term expires, the material enters the public domain.
They won't; copyright has nothing to do with that.
No. Public domain means that the material is available for use by anyone, without copyright restriction.