Want this question answered?
A new idea that could be a answer to energy problems.
no. what would give you that idea?
In each atom of our body, we have a nucleus. This is a Good Idea.
No. Not in any imaginable way. It is a good idea to have security alarms at a nuclear reactor site.
If the Philippines were to switch to nuclear power, it would answer the power shortage. The Bataan Nuclear Power Plant, if operational, could shoulder half of the country's power consumption. A great disadvantage, however, is the position of the plant. It's constructed right along a fault line. Also, a nuclear accident is also another thing.
bully's , save energy
Yes. The bigger question should be "what is the risk/benefit ratio of nuclear energy?" That is subject to great debate, but the hard science behind all of it suggests strongly that it is lower than most of us will admit. Nuclear energy is environmentally safe, in the grand scheme of things, both from the perspective of accidental radioactivity release and from the ecological perspective of it not being a good idea at all to continue using fossil fuels.
maybe
Nuclear energy is a faustian bargain. OR A faustian pact with nuclear energy. Even if you don't agree, the idea is that 'faustian' is an adjective typically describing a deal or pact (presumably with the devil or something associated with or compared to the devil).
NUCLEAR DEBATE 1)Proponents of nuclear energy assert that nuclear power is a compact, reliable sustainable energy source that reduces carbon emissions and increases energy security. Proponents highlight that nuclear energy's operational safety record is already very good when compared to other major power plant technologies. They claim that the risks of waste and other environmental impacts are small compared to other sources of electricity and can be further reduced by improved technology in new reactors. 2)Mainly to produce electricity. Also to produce radio-isotopes for medical and industrial use 3)The two "basic types" of nuclear energy are based on fission and fussion. Fission is basically atom splitting. Fusion is the forcing together of nuclei and causing them to fuse, to stick together, and to form a new nucleus. In both nuclear reactions, a lot of heat is generated. The reactions can be set up to occur "really fast" and release energy all at one. This the idea behind the nuclear weapons. There is another idea. Because the primary useful energy released in nuclear reactions is heat, that heat can be captured to do useful work. At present, we can't do any "controlled fusion" and capture heat to generate electric power. But we can use fission to our advantage to make heat to boil water to generate steam to turn a turbine to turn a generator and make electricity. And we do this pretty well.
Reading Richard Rhodes books:The Making of the Atomic BombDark Sunshould give you a good idea.
usefull