No, science has an empirial not a theoretical root
Science is a reflection of physical repeatable experiment coupled with a language that tries its best to speak the truth,
if either the experiment or the accuracy and intention of the language used to report it are suspect then so to is the science
Philosophy is regal, womanly regal. It was the earliest to develop out of human thoughts. It is considered a mother to all sciences. It in fact spawns sciences. Philosophy attempts speculation on things when science is not able to test them. Philosophy forms hypotheses which, when it becomes equipped enough, Science puts to tests and either proves to theories or discards as fallacies. Philosophy walks in front of science leading it, and progresses through science into newer hypotheses, unsatiatingly. Every science begins as philosophy and ends as art. Leaving her gains to her children, i.e., the sciences, philosophy like a regal queen mother passes on discontentedly to the yet unexplored things which she alone can speculate on.
James H. Fetzer has written: 'Philosophy and Cognitive Science' 'Philosophy of science' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy 'Computers and cognition' -- subject(s): Cognitive science 'Glossary of epistemology/philosophy of science' -- subject(s): Dictionaries, Knowledge, Theory of, Philosophy, Science, Theory of Knowledge 'Artificial intelligence' -- subject(s): Artificial intelligence 'Philosophy and cognitive science' -- subject(s): Philosophy and cognitive science
Philosophy is subjective and science is objective.
Philosophy is a science by it self.Human society is a laboratory for its experiments.
Philosophy is no longer a field of Science at all. Science, specifically Physics, did develop from Philosophy, and other Sciences developed from Physics. This (above) explains the term "PhD" (Doctor of Philosophy) and "Physician". There are many differences between Philosophy and Science. The most important is probably that Science deals exclusively with physical objects (living or not), while Philosophy has a wider area of concern. Also, in Science, questions can (often) be answered by performing an experiment. If everyone agrees that the experiment was designed and done well, the results are accepted as "the correct answer." It is not like that in Philosophy.
Unlike science, philosophy is not based on observable truths or known facts.
Political science IS a philosophy. It is the study of how people form politics and policies.
Yes, philosophy is an abstract science.
Morality is a branch of philosophy, not science.
"Is semantics a Philosophy or a science" is a question of concern. In order to answer it we , firstly, need to know about philosophy and science. Philosophy, in simple words, is knowledge. It is a rational investigation of truths and principles of being, knowledge or conduct. Science, on the other hand, is the emperical evidence of knowledge. These evidence, are based on experience or observation. Though observation or experience or experiment the knowledge we get is called science. When we know know what philosophy and science are, we can nominate semantics both. Semantic is philosophy and science as well. We know that semantics is the study of meaning. It is meaning of the words and sentences as well. When we say that semantic is a philosophy, it means we know the
Luciano Floridi has written: 'Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy' 'The need for gnoseology' 'The philosophy of information' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Information science 'Philosophy and Computing' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Computer science
Lisa Bortolotti has written: 'An introduction to the philosophy of science' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy