Want this question answered?
weirdo!
Ethical Relativism holds that ethics change when the situation changes. (I.e. while it might be wrong for an average person to commit theft, it would be acceptable for a starving person to steal to feed his family.) Cultural Relativism holds that due to culture and history being different in different regions, different truths are acceptable. Cultural Relativism stresses that different cultures have this sort of relationship. (I.e. Aztecs sacrificed humans and it's OK in their culture, but killing people in ours is a crime punishable by death.) Divine Theory is more Universalist in nature. According to Divine Theory, if you reject the Divine Law, you are performing wrong actions regardless of whether or not you concede the validity of the Divine Theory. This means that upbringing and culture are no excuse to avoiding the Universalist Code of Ethics. (The thief in the Ethical Relativism case would still be doing wrong.)
Divine Command Theory (DCT) is a theory that stands to say that something is morally acceptable simply "because God says so." (ie: To donate to charity is "good." What makes giving to charity good? "Because God commands it.") Cultural Relativism/Ethnocentrism (CR) is a theory that states that there is no universal code for morality, rather that one's cultural upbringing determines morality. (ie: Just because Americans do not traditionally practice cannibalism, that does not make it morally wrong. Other cultures are raised to think this is a natural and normal practice.) Hope this answers your question!
Ethical relativism denies universal moral principles, claiming that moral codes are strictly subjective. Ethical situationalism states moral principles are objective, and should be applied differently in different contexts.
DEONTOLOGY100% Sure
united nations or increase use of fieldwork among anthropologist
what is the fundamental difference between act utilitarianism and ethical relativism? is a good and bad discussion about the true of life
what is the answer the theory that holds that there is no universal moral truth and that instead there are only beliefs, perspectives and values answer. is it relativism
the antonyms for relativism is realism. relativism means that concept of good / bad, wrong /right is relative to society and it varies from one to another society. on the other hand, realism means that a particular concept is standard for all societies i.e it does not change from one society to another.
Marketing relativism is a subtle and unintended result of cultural conditioning.
In ethics one must approach the situation from the ethical relativism point of view. Ethical relativism places the decision between right or wrong with the group of people affected.
Yes, Aristotle was against relativism. He believed in the existence of objective truths that are universal and not dependent on individual perspectives or beliefs. Aristotle's philosophy emphasized the importance of reason and rationality in determining what is good and true.