you asked for it..
drive safely
The 94/95 were in no way faster than the later Mustangs. Yeah, yeah they had better torque throughout lower rpm's, but the 281 was a brand new motor in 96. The 302 came out in what year 196?'s. The 94/95 will have it off the line, but as soon as you reach for the first shift the 96+ will be gaining it back. No high speed race would ever even compare. The rev happy OHC motors will take the race anytime.
idk ive driven both and the 94 95 are faster andi belive 96-98 are the slowest v8 for mustangs that's why they changed it in 99
yes a 2008 mustang is faster than a 1969 mustang
no, ferrari is faster than mustang
Yes, the final model Spitfire was about 30 mph faster than the last Mustang.
The Bugatti Veyron is faster and it is 3 times faster than the mustang gt
No
if a corvette isn't faster than a viper and the corvette is faster than a mustang do you really think it can beat the viper?
the SRT should be faster than the plain mustang GT.
No its not but its faster than a corvette and mustang No, but they are close, and you're right about the enzo being faster than the mustang but it's not faster than the corvette ZR1. And the lingenfelter c5 corvette is faster than both of them.
A ford gt is faster.
The 2012 mustang is faster. Even though the camaro has more hp the mustang is lighter and faster than the camaro and the charger / challenger.
Camaro V8 is much faster than any type of mustang
The mustang gt 500 is way faster than a skyline, the mustang would smoke it anyday in a race.