The Churches almost unanimously continue to insist that the Gospels of Matthew and John were written by eyewitnesses to the events described, and that the Gospels of Mark and Luke were written independently by early apostles - simply ignoring an overwhelming consensus of New Testament scholars to the contrary. We also know the Bible has undergone many changes over the centuries, and there are many passages that we now know to have been altered or even added long after the original books were written. The failure of Christian Churches to acknowledge these interpolations and have them removed from Bibles ought to affect the credibility of the Churches as a whole. A credible source of information can challenge findings with which it disagrees, suggesting alternative explanations for the evidence, but it can never simply ignore them.
The Catholic Church is unique in its commitment over the last two centuries to hagiology - the veneration or even worship of saints. Claims of apparitions of the Virgin Mary, at Guadalupe, Fatima, Lourdes and elsewhere, may do much to retain the support and commitment ofthe faithful, but they also undermine the credibility of the Church. Claims about the tilma of Guadalupe such as the portrait having a heartbeat and of the portrait's eyes having miraculous properties belong in the realm of fantasy or downright fraud. The implicit or even overt support given by the Church to those claims seem to demonstrate an institution unconcerned with credibility.
The role of the Church is to win followers and hold on to them. Although there are many honourable clergy, some in the Church hierarchy would seem willing to believe and say whatever it takes to achieve this objective. If the information provided seems doubtful, it would be wise to chack with an independent and unbiased source.
Ask yourself if the source of the information is credible.
"Credible" is defined as "Being believable, based on information, source or fact." - Something that is credible, is reliable, it's trustworthy.
Credible is believable, based on information or fact; not credible is not believable because it may be based on opinion, a biased source, and contain little actual information or fact.
study information from texts on ancient China and N. America to discern which source is credible
There are several indicators that can determine how credible a source is, however, the one that sticks out the most is based upon factual information. When reviewing a source check to see if the information within is fact based. If you cannot find another source to back the information as fact, chances are this is not a reliable source to use.
If a source is biased, it provides information which is slanted one way or another. It isn't a credible source because it isn't presenting the facts in a straight-forward manner.
Scholastic is generally considered a credible source, especially in the context of educational materials for children and young adults. However, as with any source, it is always recommended to verify information independently from multiple sources.
Wiki isn't a credible source, because, it doesn't really give off correct information.
Credible information refers to data, facts, or details that can be trusted as accurate, reliable, and trustworthy. It is information that has been researched, verified, and comes from a reputable source. Credible information is essential for making informed decisions and forming opinions based on reliable evidence.
Finding information from credible sources is important because it ensures the accuracy and reliability of the information. Credible sources are more likely to have undergone rigorous fact-checking and adhere to high standards of accuracy, giving you confidence in the information you are using. Additionally, using credible sources helps prevent the spread of misinformation or fake news.
He was a reported for many years
A reliable and credible source would typically be written by an expert in the field, cite reputable sources, and be published by a respected publication or institution. Additionally, the information presented should be supported by evidence and not show any bias or agenda.