No. North Korea's military contains old equipment and ineffective technology. North Korea relies very heavily on the fact that it does not actually have to engage its forces against its enemies, rather it relies on the myth of greatness in the show of numbers and display of fanaticism and loyalty.
N Korean soldiers are considered fanatical and are considered loyal as long as its forces remain intact. They however, lack the ability to adapt and act independently when their planned environment disintegrates.
US/South Korean tanks and missiles can engage and destroy the DPRK vehicles long before the N Korean vehicles are in range to return fire. N Korea has no answer to US and South Korean long range Air to Air missiles, they have no answer to US GPS guided cruise missiles and no answer to GPS guided precision air to ground bombs. The US has long ago worked out counter measures to all of the N Korean 70s and 80s technology, while impressive on battlefield demonstrations, these rapid fire behemoths are generally not effective in the 21st century.
The US strategy would be to rely on precision attacks that overwhelm the approaching enemy with overwhelming firepower.
Every last N Korean naval ship would be destroyed before any US ship was in range of N Korean guns. Every N Korean air squadron would be grounded or destroyed with a couple of days.
The 30 year period from 1980-2010 was the greatest leap in military technology ever with the rise of micro electronics, laser sensing and GPS. The N Koreans simply have missed that leap.
A conflict between North Korea and South Korea\US would resemble more Kuwait/Iraq 1991 than Kursk. The N Koreans would put up pockets of resistance in certain mountainous areas, however the US/S Korean strategy at that point would likely be to stand off those skirmishes and wait out the collapse of the N Korean military.
As far as nukes are concerned, the US/S Koreans would likely no want to obliterate N Korea even if the North attempted an attack. The North has very few nukes and no real way to affectively launch a nuke attack. The best they could ever do would be to threaten a civl catastrophe. If they succeeded in causing a massacre of civilians in the South with a couple of bombs, it would only hasten the North's downfall.
The US would not allow a post nuke attack N Korea to stand.
Yes, South Korea is stronger and more powerful than North Korea. North Korea is bigger than South Korea doesn't mean that South Korea is weaker than North Korea. North Korea= Bigger than South Korea but South Korea has a lot more military manpower than North Korea. North Korea has more space than South Korea but South Korea have more very well trained soldiers, stronger military than North Korea, more advanced tactical nuclear weapons than North Korea, smarter and more talented than North Korea.
North Korea was stronger then south Korea at the beginning of the battle because South Korea was all by their self while The U.S flew back to U.S.A. So North Korea was stronger when the U.S left and they were trained frequently , But South Korea didnt really have that much of a traning.
usa &china
NEVER! First of all, it was the Soviet Union at that time, and SU never entered the Korean War! This is not entirely true, as of 2003, recently opened Russian archives and from research by Russian and American historians found the following: "Soviet pilots battled the U.S. Air Force in the early months in the skies over Korea using planes transported secretly to air bases along the Manchurian border. The Soviet pilots wore Chinese uniforms and were trained to use Chinese phrases on their radios to mask their involvement in the war."
Mexico is currently around 10-15, because of its growing economy and the fight against drug organizations, which has urged the Mexican Government to make the Army stronger, much better equipped and with much more investment in the Army than before.
I do not know.. I don't think anyone would know the answer to that, but since I'm a South Korean, I say that South Korean women are going to win! Since North Korean women don't have much rights, but South Korean women have all the rights a person needs, I think South Korean women would be more stronger than North Korean women in any way.
Nope. For sure. :)
The US Army is currently the only globally recognized superpower, so they are unquestionably "stronger" than the army of India.
The South Korean economy is about 20 times larger than the North Korean economy.
Yes, South Korea is stronger and more powerful than North Korea. North Korea is bigger than South Korea doesn't mean that South Korea is weaker than North Korea. North Korea= Bigger than South Korea but South Korea has a lot more military manpower than North Korea. North Korea has more space than South Korea but South Korea have more very well trained soldiers, stronger military than North Korea, more advanced tactical nuclear weapons than North Korea, smarter and more talented than North Korea.
Yes they are.
Pakistan is more stronger than france,pakistan has a well trained army
Swiss Army watches are hypoallergenic, if they are made from titanium. These watches are also stronger than steel and lighter than steel.
This is not the case; the Korean Won is much stronger than the Nepalese Rupee since the government of South Korea is much stronger than that of Nepal. The term "weak currency" does not refer to the relative value of the currency, so the fact that 1 NPR = 10.61 KRW does not mean that the Nepalese Rupee is 10x stronger that the Korean Won, just that each unit is 10x more valuable.
NO
North Korea is bigger and has more troops than South Korea but South Korea has a lot of very well trained soldiers and has more advanced technologies and high-tech weapons than North Korea! The answer is yes, South Korea is stronger than North Korea!
Which of these two forces are stronger than the other? either individually or in Teams. who generally is The Best?