Yes.
The different versions of the Bible are all the smae Bible but the words used may be slightly different making the language more up to date or one easier to read than another.
ANSWERER (B) - They are not the same.
There are many words both added to and missing from these Roman Catholic Bibles: New American Bible and the Rheims-Douay.
Adding to Scripture
The New American, Douay/Rheims and other Roman Catholic Bibles add to Scripture.
Old Testament Apocrypha -
The Roman Catholic Old Testament adds uninspired books, which we call Apocrypha, to the Bible, as if it were scripture.
Roman Catholic Bibles, from the 300s AD to the present, include these uninspired Alexandrian Egyptian additions to Scripture. It wasn't until 1548 at the Roman Catholic Council of Trent that the Apocrypha was declared to be actual Scripture, in reaction to the Protestant Bibles. Translators of the King James Bible, God's preserved words in English, were told to include the Apocrypha. But they wrote seven excellent reasons why not to include it in Scripture. Alexander McClure, in his book Translators Revived wrote down these reasons:
So the translators were careful to separate the Apocrypha from the Bible, putting it in a separate section between the Old and New Testaments, with each page clearly labeled, "Apocrypha." The last page of II Maccabees, in the 1611 King James reads, "End of Apocrypha." Then it returns to God's inspired words in Matthew. Taking away from Scripture
New Testament -
But the Roman Catholic Bible is a perverted Alexandrian Egyptian Bible, not a preserved Antiochian Bible, like the King James. It is a combination of the heretical Egyptian Bible, including the Alexandrian Apocrypha, and blended to look like the preserved Vaudois Latin scriptures. It omits thousands of words and a number of entire verses.
The Roman Catholic New American Bible (also called the "St. Joseph's Bible" is very similar, almost identical in New Testament text to many Protestant Bibles
There is a lot added to (the Apocrypha) and taken away from the Catholic Bibles. Most modern Protestant Bibles do not contain the Apocrypha, though some do. But there is almost no difference at all between the Roman Catholic New Testament and the modern Protestant versions. The only way to completely avoid this "broad way" is to take the narrow path and read the King James Bible.
The New King James Version of the Bible was translated from the same type of old manuscripts that formed the original King James Version. There were 130 translators led by the Executive Editor, Arthur Farstad. The completed Bible was published in 1979 by Thomas Nelson Publishers.
Masons BibleIts the same. Though some Masons use a Bible with the added Apocrypha.Its the same Bible, just understood differentlyThe Apocryphal Book Were never inspired by God. See Counsel of NiceaAnd No they are Not the same.
1Co 12:25 That there should be no schism in the body; but that the members should have the same care one for another. King James Version
In the King James version, the word - change - appears 26 times, never in the same verse as the word 'heart'.
Same answer as above. Search Strong's Exhaustive Concordance on the web to find out if any word is used in the King James Bible. To answer the question, no, there is no use of the word spellbound in the KJV. Perhaps in other translations?
It is pretty much the same. One difference I found was at Psalms 68:4, whereas the 21st Century King James uses the devine name of God, Jehovah, the King James uses the shortened form, Jah.
No, the King James Bible and Catholic Bible are not identical in terms of meanings. There are differences in translation choices, interpretation of certain passages, and inclusion of certain books. These variations can lead to differences in understanding and emphasis on certain theological beliefs.
It was undoubtedly the King James Version, since he was sworn in on the same Bible used by Abraham Lincoln, and back then, the King James translation was considered the standard for most Protestant Christians.
The New King James Version of the Bible was translated from the same type of old manuscripts that formed the original King James Version. There were 130 translators led by the Executive Editor, Arthur Farstad. The completed Bible was published in 1979 by Thomas Nelson Publishers.
Both were written in Early Modern English, the same language.
They were written at approximately the same time.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (the "Mormon" church") uses the King James Version of the Bible (for English speakers), with no changes to the text. The church does publish it's own version which includes cross-references with the Book of Mormon, but members are welcome to use any King James Version Bible. Mormons speaking other languages use whatever Bible version is available in their language. The King James Version of the Bible is the most common Bible for English speaking Christians. Other popular Bible versions are the New King James, New International Version, and Revised Standard Version. Mormons are welcome to use other versions of the Bible for their personal study, but the official Bible of the Mormon Church is the King James. You are welcome to read the Mormon version of the King James Bible online or order your own paper copy at the "Related Links" below.
Masons BibleIts the same. Though some Masons use a Bible with the added Apocrypha.Its the same Bible, just understood differentlyThe Apocryphal Book Were never inspired by God. See Counsel of NiceaAnd No they are Not the same.
The same as they are now and were translated in the King James Version of the Bible in 1611 AD.
Shakespeare belonged to the Church of England as did everyone else in England and so he used the same Bible as everyone else. Later in his life this would be the Bible commissioned by King James.
There is no such thing as 'one true Bible.' There are many translations of Scripture with some being more accurate or truer to the original meaning while others insert the translators' interpretation of the sentence/paragraph. But all are more or less presenting the same message. Many suggest that the King James or New King James Versions are better for study as they are closer to the original text.
There is nothing wrong with the King James Bible. If you are asking in regard to why some people prefer to use other versions, then it would be because the King James version is written in old English which is hard for some people to understand. Therefore other versions were written to make them more understandable to a modern world. As long as the basic text is the same, different versions can be used. I prefer to refer to different versions to help me understand a certain verse. I own a King James, NIV, and Living Bible. Each one has a unique way of portraying the same text.