The law and the constitution are not necessarily superior to ethics, however, they are more clearly defined, and they are enforced by the government. There are certainly some cases in which a particular individual has a better understanding of ethics than the police, judges, or other officials with whom he or she may be dealing. There are also lots of cases in which individuals have less understanding or less concern for ethics than government officials do. But in either case, governments have considerable power with which to enforce the law.
Ethics come first, then the law is needed to uphold those ethics.
When a law enforcement agency acts in an unethical manner, this subverts the legal system. If the public has more to fear from law enforcement agencies than it does from the criminals that the law enforcement agencies were created to deal with, then we would be better off without law enforcement. Tyranny does more harm than crime.
Yes.
Ethics and the law
Neither procedural law or substantive law are more important than the other. All crime needs to have a known punishment (substantive) and a proper way to get to that punishment (procedural).
There is more than one system. (1) religion, (2) ethics, (3) natural law
ethics talk about right and rong, same with the law
Ethics and the law
The independence of who? Regardless of who though, yes, it is and will always be more important than one country's basis for law.
Haemon is more concerned with human law and the stability of the city-state. He believes in obeying the laws of the land and argues that Antigone should not go against them, thereby promoting social order and the well-being of the community. He values the rule of law over divine authority in this context.
cyber ethics ror kids
Justinian's most important achievement was more than likely his law code.
differences between law and ethic . A law is something you must obey. Ethics is how society expects you to behave.