No, it's not. Energy is lost through waste heat (from the reaction) and energy loss from the decay of the nuclear fuel at the heart of the reactor.
No, no machine is 100% efficient.
power in equals power output plus power loss so input power for this question is 100 kw now use efficiency formula 100/80 times 100 to get 80% efficient
false A+
Even if the friction were totally eliminated, a heat engine still could not convert heat completely into work and be 100 percent efficient. Instead, the efficiency of an internal combustion engine depends on the difference in the temperature of the burning gases in the cylinder and the temperature of the burning gases in the cylinder and the temperature of the air outside the engine.
over 100 decibles, at least.
No, no machine is 100% efficient.
because they are not proper
As a chain this would work, but generators and batteries are not 100% efficient, so you will lose energy at each step. Subsequent batteries and generators along the chain will become less powerful as the energy dissipates.
On a standby generator 100 percent of the power drops before the generator will start.
Basically, almost NO physical process is 100% efficient.
It would be used as a more efficient version of a Nuclear Reactor. While a regular nuclear reactor requires almost a factor of 100 greater in fuel amounts, a Breeder reactor uses much less and produces less waste.
power in equals power output plus power loss so input power for this question is 100 kw now use efficiency formula 100/80 times 100 to get 80% efficient
it is not very efficientAnswerThey are 100 percent efficient.
f an automobile had a 100 efficient engine would it exhaust the surroundings?
Pakistan has about 100 nuclear weapons.
false A+
No. Nothing is 100 percent efficient. In any situation some energy will be given off in a form that is useless to us.