0
The expression is "have a listen" and it is very informal without being grammatically incorrect.
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Yes, the phrase "take a listen" is grammatically correct. It is a casual way of suggesting that someone should listen to something.
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoTechnically, no it is not. The phrase should be 'Listen to this'.
Nonsense. Of course it is. It may be informal, maybe even a little cheap, but it violates no rules of grammar.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Is it grammatically correct to say for an instance?
No, the correct phrase is "for instance." It is used to introduce an example or specific case.
Is it correct to say should I take these ones?
No, it is not correct grammatically. The correct phrasing would be "Should I take these?" or "Should I take these ones?"
Is guests' grammatically correct?
Yes, "guests'" is grammatically correct. It is the possessive form of the plural noun "guests," indicating that something belongs to or is associated with multiple guests.
Is this sentence grammatically correct- i will take notes at the meetingi?
No, the sentence is not grammatically correct. It should be: "I will take notes at the meeting." Remember to capitalize the first letter of the sentence and add a space after the period.
What is grammatically correct you took a test or you gave a test?
"You took a test" is grammatically correct. "You gave a test" would mean that you were the one administering the test to someone else.
Is guests' grammatically correct?
Yes, "guests'" is grammatically correct. It is the possessive form of the plural noun "guests," indicating that something belongs to or is associated with multiple guests.
Is it grammatically correct to say for an instance?
No, the correct phrase is "for instance." It is used to introduce an example or specific case.
Is it grammatically correct to say take control of himself?
YES
Is the phrase come in action correct English when used in the same manner as get into action Example The police were called to come in action?
It is correct grammatically, but not idiomatic. We say the police were called to TAKE action, to GET INTO action, or to BECOME ACTIVE.
Is the phrase come in action correct English when used in the same manner as get into action. Example The police were called to come in action.?
It is correct grammatically, but not idiomatic. We say the police were called to TAKE action, to GET INTO action, or to BECOME ACTIVE.
Is this following sentence correct you had not to take that in account?
You had not taken that into account. Would be the grammatically correct version of that sentence.
Is this sentence grammatically correct - you will take notes at the meeting?
Yes, it is perfectly valid.
Is 'attending an exam' grammatically correct?
Its problem is not grammatical, but idiomatic. We say take an exam, or sit for an exam, but we do not say attend an exam. A sentence may be grammatically correct and still wrong.
Is this sentence grammatically correct- i will take notes at the meetingi?
No, the sentence is not grammatically correct. It should be: "I will take notes at the meeting." Remember to capitalize the first letter of the sentence and add a space after the period.
What is the difference between do not take it serious and do not take it seriously?
The first statement uses incorrect grammar, the second is grammatically correct.
What is grammatically correct you took a test or you gave a test?
"You took a test" is grammatically correct. "You gave a test" would mean that you were the one administering the test to someone else.
Is it grammatically correct to use -a commitment to provide or a commitment to providing?
they take it as their duty and commitment to provide a world-class
