Camelot was where King Arthur lived. In present day, some believe it is Tintangel, a coastal castle in western England.
High Renaissance is a period during Renaissance -it's the middle part, in about the 16th century.
They didn't have the technologies that other civilizations did. They stayed the same from the classical period to the post classical period based on technology
The Middle Ages were coming to an end just about the time the Tudors were gaining power. Owen Tudor was clearly a man of the Middle Ages. His grandson, King Henry VII, is the man I think of as the first Renaissance King of England. In fact, if you look at the coins minted in England during the Late Middle Ages, each king's portrait on the pennies looks exactly like the previous king's, and all were face on. King Henry VII had the same portrait on his early coins, but his later coins had a realistic profile, which was quite obviously Renaissance art...
Julius Caesar was NOT a king, Rome had been a republic for several hundred years. Before that, it had been ruled by kings, and after Caesar's murder it soon switched to emperors (for the first decades there were 2 then 3 rulers at the same time, but then they decided 1 emperor was enough!).
Pretty much the same as they are now- the Mediaeval period was only about 600 years ago, a tiny period in the overall history of the planet, and there hasn't been significant geographical change in such a short span of time. If you want to see what European bodies of water there are, look in an atlas of Europe or Google a European map on the internet.
Moses and king tut weren't living at the same time period. The only thing that is in common in the time period they lived in is that they both live before Jesus was born
It is unknown if there ever was a King Arthur; perhaps his stories are partly fictional and partly based upon stories of several different kings. There is a ruin called Tintagel, which is on the west coast of Cornwall at aprox the same lattitude as Exeter.
Would like to know same answer if you get one ty
During the Kennedy administration, the White House was called Camelot because King Author was an idealistic ruler who was trying to change the way governments were run to be more humanistic and for all the people. JFK was trying to do the same, but was assassinated before we could find out if he could do it. (I hope this is not for a homework assignment that you should be doing yourself).
No. The legendary King Arthur who sometimes holds court at Camelot was the son of Uther Pendragon and is never called a Tudor. There were some other minor King Arthur in Britain several years later, but no one important. As being of Welsh descent and descended from nobility, the Tudors claimed to be heirs of Arthur. This is sometimes misrepresented as a claim that they were descendants of Arthur. However no-one, to my knowledge, as yet substantiated this second claim either from a reputable source or by providing a genealogy that would show how the Tudors were descended from Arthur.
I had the same question for sometimes, it appears Maxims 2000 have Chain instead of Camelot
King david is said to have ruled c.1000BC This period is known in ancient Egyptian history as the Third Inermediate Period (1076-712BC). Inermediate periods are times of confusion when no king rules over the whole of Egypt. It is of interest to note that in this period the Egyptians lost control of Palestine.
The Mediaeval period is reckoned from the fifth to the fifteenth century. Arthur's time was in the sixth century, at the very beginning of the Middle Ages.
They are in the same group and they are not in the same period.
No, Cleopatra and King Tut lived in different time periods. Even if they had lived in the same time period, King Tut was a boy. It is extremely unlikely that Cleopatra would have been interested in someone so young.
Elements in same period have same shell. The electron enters outermost shell.
the period