Not in the outcome.
Mr. Sattar will arriving on 5th. Is it right sentence?
The word late is an adverb, but it is the object of the participle "arriving" and the participial phrase "arriving late" is the object of the sentence (what I hate).
The past progressive of "arrived" is "was arriving" or "were arriving," depending on the subject of the sentence.
Yes, the sentence contains a dangling modifier. To correct it, you could say: "Arriving ten minutes late, I found that the store was closed for the night."
Yes there should be an apostrophe. Tomorrow's answers today.
well an allusion is referring to a person and/or incident in a sentence. So if I said "Tomorrows game could be my waterloo" that would mean that tomorrows game could be the end of me. The reader understands this because they know what happened at waterloo.
The monarch will be arriving soon.
Yes. This document is for tomorrow's meeting. The meeting belongs to tomorrow.
Yes. This document is for tomorrow's meeting. The meeting belongs to tomorrow.
Our guests will be arriving within minutes.
Example sentence - I should have left the house sooner to avoid arriving late to the meeting.
The title or tag "IT Solutions For Tomorrows Technical Challenges" needs an apostrophe on Tomorrow. In this sentence. Tomorrow owns or has possession over "Technical Challenges", making it become a singular possessive. So the title or tag should read "IT Solutions For Tomorrow's Technical Challenges".