No, there is no problem with that. In most cases there are going to be two copies of a contract. Each party is going to want an original to use if they have to go to court.
A fully-executed copy is a document that has been signed by all parties. The copy is the original document but copies of it can be made.
A document signed under duress is invalid. The only problem is proving the duress.
A signed, notarized document is a legal document.A signed, notarized document is a legal document.A signed, notarized document is a legal document.A signed, notarized document is a legal document.
There is no record of any one of the 12 original signatories being 'first', since there were four copies in four different languages signed by all 12 countries. The signature lines were prepared with the document, and do not reflect the sequence in which each document was signed.
Saves you time by not having to run to a copy store. Also allows you to make and give copies of clients original documents after contracts are signed.
Yes, the original letter should be signed before making copies to maintain authenticity. The copies themselves do not need to be signed unless necessary for legal or administrative reasons.
what danforth does to those who signed the document was that he decides to arrest them all to be question about the document.
This document has not been signed yet.
The document must be signed to be legal. Sign the document and return it to me.
It was 9 copies of the treaty paper.
There are multiple type of titles, such as vehicle, aircraft, and so on. An incorrectly signed or notated title may create invalidity of the document. These errors can be resolved by having the titling authority reissue the document or provide an official letter or ruling of judgment in the matter.
Generally, no. Once a document has been signed by the parties it cannot be altered by a third party.