The nature of Atheism allows it only to have rational, as opposed to supernatural, arguments. Most comments against atheism fall into the category of fallacious arguments, not rational arguments. Most arguments proposed by atheist to provide the validation of their position are based on logic and the scientific method.
Of course not, there is no rational argument against homosexuality.
"Rational" is an adjective and so there cannot be "a rational" (and certainly not "an rational"). Any answer would depend on whether the question was about a rational number, a rational person, a rational argument or "a rational" combined with some other noun.
A decision or argument based on sound reasoned argument which can be proved - logical.
A good salesman is the one who can made a rational argument from irrational argument...
Atheism is a position on the "Is there a god" discussion. it derives no more purpose from that position than having a position on the "Is there a monster under my bed" question gives purpose or meaning to an adult's life.
Atheism is the belief that there is no God or a lack of belief in the existence of God or gods.Atheism is not a religion. If you see that the question "What is the religion of non-Catholicism" is meaningless, then you grasp the idea. There are some faith-based individuals who make the argument that atheism is indeed a religion since it places an individual in a certain position before the deity, but this argument is rhetorical and dramatic, meant to help persuade others to take a theistic position. The argument may have a specialized meaning to people who already believe. The concept of atheism as a religion has no meaning whatever to atheists.
For an argument to succeed with a rational, philosophically trained person, it must be logically coherent, well-structured, and based on sound premises. Additionally, it should address potential counterarguments and provide sufficient evidence or reasoning to support its conclusions. Clarity of expression and relevance to the discussed topic are also crucial for effective communication. Ultimately, the argument must appeal to rational discourse and critical thinking principles.
An invalid argument does not make sense logically. The statements in the argument are not connected in a rational way. A sound argument must not only be valid (logically connected) but also based on true premises. Therefore an argument may be unsound because it makes no logical sense, because the premises are flawed, or both.
The Argument from outrage is a fallacy where someone's argument is based solely on an emotional response such as anger or indignation rather than on logical reasoning or evidence. It focuses on evoking an emotional reaction rather than engaging in a rational discussion.
Money has nothing to do with atheism, which is simply a rational lack of belief in a God or gods. Atheism has no need of money to preach its cause, because atheism does not send missionaries out into the world. Atheists, almost by definition, are not televangelists and are therefore not tempted by the opportunities of televangelism. Some atheists may donate money to worthy causes, not because they are atheists but simply because they are good people. No doubt, some atheists may be corrupt, just as some people of faith are corrupt, but in neither case can this be put down to their belief or lack of belief.
Deists believe a God (or Gods) exist. Atheists do not. Deists tend to believe God is a rational explanation for the existence of the universe, but rarely if ever intervenes in its operation.
Atheism is a noun.